• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

背侧流和腹侧流对成对物体赋予效应的贡献。

Dorsal and ventral stream contribution to the paired-object affordance effect.

机构信息

Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, LPNC UMR 5105, Grenoble, France.

Univ. Lille, CNRS, CHU Lille, UMR 9193, SCALab - Sciences Cognitives et Sciences Affectives, F-59000 Lille, France.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2018 Apr;112:125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.007
PMID:29522759
Abstract

Visual extinction, a parietal syndrome in which patients exhibit perceptual impairments when two objects are simultaneously presented in the visual field, is reduced when objects are correctly positioned for action, indicating that action helps patients' visual attention. Similarly, healthy individuals make faster action decisions on object pairs that appear in left/right standard co-location for actions in comparison to object pairs that appear in a mirror location, a phenomenon called the paired-object affordance effect. However, the neural locus of such effect remains debated and may be related to the activity of ventral or dorsal brain regions. The present fMRI study aims at determining the neural substrates of the paired-object affordance effect. Fourteen right-handed participants made decisions about semantically related (i.e. thematically related and co-manipulated) and unrelated object pairs. Pairs were either positioned in a standard location for a right-handed action (with the active object - lid - in the right visual hemifield, and the passive object - pan - in the left visual hemifield), or in the reverse location. Behavioral results showed a suppression of the observed cost of correctly positioning related pairs for action when performing action decisions (deciding if the two objects are usually used together), but not when performing contextual decisions (deciding if the two objects are typically found in the kitchen). Anterior regions of the dorsal stream (e.g. supplementary motor area) responded to inadequate object co-positioning for action, but only when the perceptual task required action decisions. In the ventral cortex, the left lateral occipital complex showed increased activation for objects correctly positioned for action in all conditions except when neither task demands nor object relatedness was relevant for action. Thus, fMRI results demonstrated a joint contribution of ventral and dorsal cortical streams to the paired-affordance effect. They further suggest that this contribution may depend on contextual situations and task demands, in line with flexible views of affordance evocation.

摘要

视觉消失,一种顶叶综合征,患者在视野中同时呈现两个物体时表现出知觉障碍,当物体被正确定位用于行动时,这种障碍会减轻,这表明行动有助于患者的视觉注意力。同样,健康个体在进行左/右标准共定位的物体对进行动作决策时比在镜像位置出现的物体对做出更快的动作决策,这种现象称为成对物体可供性效应。然而,这种效应的神经定位仍然存在争议,可能与腹侧或背侧脑区的活动有关。本 fMRI 研究旨在确定成对物体可供性效应的神经基础。14 名右利手参与者对语义相关(即主题相关和共同操作)和不相关的物体对做出决策。物体对要么位于适合右手动作的标准位置(主动物体-盖子-在右视觉半视野,被动物体-平底锅-在左视觉半视野),要么位于相反的位置。行为结果表明,在执行动作决策(判断两个物体是否通常一起使用)时,正确定位相关物体对动作的观察成本受到抑制,但在执行上下文决策(判断两个物体是否通常在厨房中找到)时则不受抑制。背侧流的前区域(例如补充运动区)对动作中物体的不适当共定位有反应,但仅在感知任务需要动作决策时才有反应。在腹侧皮层中,左侧外侧枕叶复合体在所有条件下对正确定位用于动作的物体显示出增加的激活,除了在既不要求任务也不要求物体相关性用于动作的情况下。因此,fMRI 结果表明,腹侧和背侧皮质流对成对可供性效应有共同贡献。它们进一步表明,这种贡献可能取决于上下文情况和任务需求,符合可供性唤起的灵活观点。

相似文献

1
Dorsal and ventral stream contribution to the paired-object affordance effect.背侧流和腹侧流对成对物体赋予效应的贡献。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Apr;112:125-134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
2
Implied actions between paired objects lead to affordance selection by inhibition.配对物体之间的隐含动作通过抑制作用导致可供性选择。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1021-36. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000059. Epub 2015 May 11.
3
Selecting object pairs for action: Is the active object always first?选择用于动作的对象对:主动对象总是排在第一位吗?
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Aug;233(8):2269-81. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4296-7. Epub 2015 May 1.
4
Neural representations of visual words and objects: a functional MRI study on the modularity of reading and object processing.视觉单词和物体的神经表征:一项关于阅读和物体处理模块性的功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain Topogr. 2007 Winter;20(2):89-96. doi: 10.1007/s10548-007-0034-1. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
5
Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study.枕叶腹侧病变损害物体识别但不损害物体导向抓握:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain. 2003 Nov;126(Pt 11):2463-75. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg248. Epub 2003 Sep 23.
6
Functional coupling between frontoparietal and occipitotemporal pathways during action and perception.动作和感知过程中额顶叶和枕颞叶通路上的功能耦合。
Cortex. 2018 Jan;98:8-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
7
FMRI of shared-stream priming of lexical identification by object semantics along the ventral visual processing stream.沿腹侧视觉加工通路的物体语义共享流引发的词汇识别的 fMRI 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Oct;133:107185. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107185. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
8
Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams.视角对背侧和腹侧通路中物体驱动激活的不同影响。
Neuron. 2002 Aug 15;35(4):793-801. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00803-6.
9
Resilience to the contralateral visual field bias as a window into object representations.对侧视野偏差的恢复力作为了解物体表征的窗口。
Cortex. 2016 Aug;81:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
10
Effects of paired-object affordance in search tasks across the adult lifespan.配对物体可供性在成年期全生命周期搜索任务中的作用。
Brain Cogn. 2016 Jun;105:22-33. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.03.009. Epub 2016 Apr 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotions Modulate Affordances-Related Motor Responses: A Priming Experiment.情绪调节与可供性相关的运动反应:一项启动实验。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 8;13:701714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.701714. eCollection 2022.
2
Editorial: Behavioral and Neural Bases of Object Affordance Processing and Its Clinical Implications.社论:物体可供性加工的行为与神经基础及其临床意义
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 24;15:759377. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.759377. eCollection 2021.
3
Hazardous tools: the emergence of reasoning in human tool use.危险工具:人类工具使用中的推理出现。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):3108-3118. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01466-2. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Looking to recognise: the pre-eminence of semantic over sensorimotor processing in human tool use.寻求识别:人类工具使用中语义处理优于感觉运动处理的优势。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 9;10(1):6157. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63045-0.
5
Neuroimaging supports the representational nature of the earliest human engravings.神经影像学研究为早期人类雕刻的具象性质提供了支持。
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jul 3;6(7):190086. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190086. eCollection 2019 Jul.