Suppr超能文献

卫生科学图书馆员与卫生专业教师之间的跨专业合作,为新生实施读书俱乐部讨论。

Interprofessional collaboration between health sciences librarians and health professions faculty to implement a book club discussion for incoming students.

机构信息

Graduate Student, School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC,

Clinical Librarian, Health Sciences Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC,

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jul;107(3):403-410. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.563. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The following case example provides an overview of one innovative way to engage health professions faculty with health sciences librarians in the development of an interprofessional book discussion and identifies strategies to address implementation challenges. Academic health sciences librarians worked with the Interprofessional Education (IPE) Steering Committee to organize interprofessional book discussion groups for incoming health professions students. This inaugural book discussion brought together students and faculty of different disciplines to engage students in "learning from, with, and about" other professions.

CASE PRESENTATION

, by Paul Kalanithi, allowed involved discussions on important health sciences issues. The project included outreach, designing pre- and post-surveys, scheduling participants, and communicating with all participants before, during, and after the event. A total of seventy-nine students and thirty-six faculty, representing all health professions schools, participated in the small group IPE book discussions over two weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Small group book discussions have been shown to be an effective tool to engage students and faculty in IPE. The results of the participant surveys were positive, and the IPE Steering Committee found value in including health sciences librarians throughout the process. Lessons learned from the pilot project include needing an efficient scheduling system, strongly communicating at all stages of the project, and starting the planning process months ahead of time. The IPE Steering Committee plans to conduct similar book discussions every fall semester moving forward and explore options for other IPE events.

摘要

背景

本案例概述了一种创新的方式,即将卫生专业教师与卫生科学图书馆员联系起来,共同开展跨专业书籍讨论,并确定了应对实施挑战的策略。学术卫生科学图书馆员与跨专业教育(IPE)指导委员会合作,为即将入学的卫生专业学生组织跨专业书籍讨论小组。这次首次的书籍讨论活动将不同学科的学生和教师聚集在一起,使学生能够“向其他专业学习、与其他专业合作并从其他专业中学习”。

案例介绍

《当呼吸化为空气》一书使参与者能够就重要的卫生科学问题展开深入讨论。该项目包括外展、设计预调查和后调查、安排参与者以及在活动前后与所有参与者进行沟通。共有 79 名学生和 36 名教师代表所有卫生专业学校,在两周内参加了小规模的跨专业 IPE 书籍讨论小组。

结论

小组书籍讨论已被证明是一种有效的工具,可以让学生和教师参与跨专业教育。参与者调查的结果是积极的,IPE 指导委员会认为在整个过程中包括卫生科学图书馆员是有价值的。从试点项目中吸取的经验教训包括需要一个高效的调度系统、在项目的各个阶段都进行强有力的沟通以及提前数月开始规划过程。IPE 指导委员会计划在未来的每个秋季学期继续开展类似的书籍讨论,并探索其他 IPE 活动的选择。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
An evaluation of forums for discussions on inclusion in a college of nursing.关于纳入护理学院的讨论论坛评估
Nurs Outlook. 2017 Jan-Feb;65(1):103-115. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验