Suppr超能文献

系统评价中的合作挑战:对健康科学图书馆员的一项调查

Collaboration challenges in systematic reviews: a survey of health sciences librarians.

作者信息

Nicholson Joey, McCrillis Aileen, Williams Jeff D

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Oct;105(4):385-393. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.176. Epub 2017 Oct 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While many librarians have been asked to participate in systematic reviews with researchers, often these researchers are not familiar with the systematic review process or the appropriate role for librarians. The purpose of this study was to identify the challenges and barriers that librarians face when collaborating on systematic reviews. To take a wider view of the whole process of collaborating on systematic reviews, the authors deliberately focused on interpersonal and methodological issues other than searching itself.

METHODS

To characterize the biggest challenges that librarians face while collaborating on systematic review projects, we used a web-based survey. The thirteen-item survey included seventeen challenges grouped into two categories: methodological and interpersonal. Participants were required to indicate the frequency and difficulty of the challenges listed. Open-ended questions allowed survey participants to describe challenges not listed in the survey and to describe strategies used to overcome challenges.

RESULTS

Of the 17 challenges listed in the survey, 8 were reported as common by over 40% of respondents. These included methodological issues around having too broad or narrow research questions, lacking eligibility criteria, having unclear research questions, and not following established methods. The remaining challenges were interpersonal, including issues around student-led projects and the size of the research team. Of the top 8 most frequent challenges, 5 were also ranked as most difficult to handle. Open-ended responses underscored many of the challenges included in the survey and revealed several additional challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the most frequent and challenging issues relate to development of the research question and general communication with team members. Clear protocols for collaboration on systematic reviews, as well as a culture of mentorship, can help librarians prevent and address these challenges.

摘要

目的

虽然许多图书馆员被要求与研究人员合作开展系统评价,但这些研究人员往往不熟悉系统评价过程或图书馆员的恰当角色。本研究的目的是确定图书馆员在合作开展系统评价时所面临的挑战和障碍。为了更全面地了解系统评价合作的整个过程,作者特意关注了除检索本身之外的人际和方法学问题。

方法

为了描述图书馆员在合作开展系统评价项目时面临的最大挑战,我们采用了基于网络的调查。这份包含13个条目的调查问卷包括17项挑战,分为两类:方法学和人际方面。参与者需要指出所列挑战的出现频率和难度。开放式问题让调查参与者能够描述未在调查问卷中列出的挑战,并描述用于克服挑战的策略。

结果

在调查问卷列出的17项挑战中,超过40%的受访者报告称其中8项挑战很常见。这些包括方法学问题,如研究问题过宽或过窄、缺乏纳入标准、研究问题不明确以及未遵循既定方法。其余挑战属于人际方面,包括学生主导项目和研究团队规模等问题。在最常出现的8项挑战中,有5项也被列为最难处理的挑战。开放式回答强调了调查问卷中包含的许多挑战,并揭示了一些其他挑战。

结论

这些结果表明,最常出现且最具挑战性的问题与研究问题的制定以及与团队成员的总体沟通有关。明确的系统评价合作协议以及指导文化有助于图书馆员预防和应对这些挑战。

相似文献

2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews.参与系统评价的图书馆员的能力框架。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):268-275. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.189. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验