Suppr超能文献

σ1受体拮抗剂CM-304及其类似物AZ-66的特性:对抗痛觉过敏和诱发性疼痛的新型疗法。

Characterization of Sigma 1 Receptor Antagonist CM-304 and Its Analog, AZ-66: Novel Therapeutics Against Allodynia and Induced Pain.

作者信息

Cirino Thomas J, Eans Shainnel O, Medina Jessica M, Wilson Lisa L, Mottinelli Marco, Intagliata Sebastiano, McCurdy Christopher R, McLaughlin Jay P

机构信息

Department of Pharmacodynamics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2019 Jun 14;10:678. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00678. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Sigma-1 receptors (S1R) and sigma-2 receptors (S2R) may modulate nociception without the liabilities of opioids, offering a promising therapeutic target to treat pain. The purpose of this study was to investigate the analgesic and anti-allodynic activity of two novel sigma receptor antagonists, the S1R-selective CM-304 and its analog the non-selective S1R/S2R antagonist AZ-66. Inhibition of thermal, induced chemical or inflammatory pain, as well as the allodynia resulting from chronic nerve constriction injury (CCI) and cisplatin exposure as models of neuropathic pain were assessed in male mice. Both sigma receptor antagonists dose-dependently (10-45 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced allodynia in the CCI and cisplatin neuropathic pain models, equivalent at the higher dose to the effect of the control analgesic gabapentin (50 mg/kg, i.p.), although AZ-66 demonstrated a much longer duration of action. Both CM-304 and AZ-66 produced antinociception in the writhing test [0.48 (0.09-1.82) and 2.31 (1.02-4.81) mg/kg, i.p., respectively] equivalent to morphine [1.75 (0.31-7.55) mg/kg, i.p.]. Likewise, pretreatment (i.p.) with either sigma-receptor antagonist dose-dependently produced antinociception in the formalin paw assay of inflammatory pain. However, CM-304 [17.5 (12.7-25.2) mg/kg, i.p.) and AZ-66 [11.6 (8.29-15.6) mg/kg, i.p.) were less efficacious than morphine [3.87 (2.85-5.18) mg/kg, i.p.] in the 55°C warm-water tail-withdrawal assay. While AZ-66 exhibited modest sedative effects in a rotarod assay and conditioned place aversion, CM-304 did not produce significant effects in the place conditioning assay. Overall, these results demonstrate the S1R selective antagonist CM-304 produces antinociception and anti-allodynia with fewer liabilities than established therapeutics, supporting the use of S1R antagonists as potential treatments for chronic pain.

摘要

西格玛-1受体(S1R)和西格玛-2受体(S2R)可能在没有阿片类药物相关不良反应的情况下调节伤害感受,为疼痛治疗提供了一个有前景的治疗靶点。本研究的目的是研究两种新型西格玛受体拮抗剂——S1R选择性拮抗剂CM-304及其类似物、非选择性S1R/S2R拮抗剂AZ-66的镇痛和抗痛觉过敏活性。在雄性小鼠中评估了对热痛、诱发的化学性或炎性疼痛的抑制作用,以及作为神经性疼痛模型的慢性神经压迫损伤(CCI)和顺铂暴露所导致的痛觉过敏。两种西格玛受体拮抗剂均剂量依赖性地(10 - 45毫克/千克,腹腔注射)减轻了CCI和顺铂神经性疼痛模型中的痛觉过敏,在较高剂量时效果与对照镇痛药加巴喷丁(50毫克/千克,腹腔注射)相当,尽管AZ-66的作用持续时间长得多。CM-304和AZ-66在扭体试验中均产生了镇痛作用[分别为0.48(0.09 - 1.82)和2.31(1.02 - 4.81)毫克/千克,腹腔注射],与吗啡[1.75(0.31 - 7.55)毫克/千克,腹腔注射]相当。同样,在炎性疼痛的福尔马林足试验中,用任何一种西格玛受体拮抗剂进行预处理(腹腔注射)均剂量依赖性地产生了镇痛作用。然而,在55°C温水甩尾试验中,CM-304[17.5(12.7 - 25.2)毫克/千克,腹腔注射]和AZ-66[11.6(8.29 - 15.6)毫克/千克,腹腔注射]的效果不如吗啡[3.87(2.85 - 5.18)毫克/千克,腹腔注射]。虽然AZ-66在转棒试验和条件性位置偏爱试验中表现出适度的镇静作用,但CM-304在位置条件试验中未产生显著影响。总体而言,这些结果表明,S1R选择性拮抗剂CM-304产生的镇痛和抗痛觉过敏作用的不良反应比现有治疗药物少,支持将S1R拮抗剂用作慢性疼痛的潜在治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eaf7/6586922/b01979c0347f/fphar-10-00678-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验