• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反事实条件句的理解:来自视觉世界范式中眼动追踪的证据。

The Comprehension of Counterfactual Conditionals: Evidence From Eye-Tracking in the Visual World Paradigm.

作者信息

Orenes Isabel, García-Madruga Juan A, Gómez-Veiga Isabel, Espino Orlando, Byrne Ruth M J

机构信息

Department of Basic Psychology I, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.

Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology (UNED), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 14;10:1172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01172. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01172
PMID:31258498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6587111/
Abstract

Three experiments tracked participants' eye-movements to examine the time course of comprehension of the dual meaning of counterfactuals, such as "if there had been oranges then there would have been pears." Participants listened to conditionals while looking at images in the visual world paradigm, including an image of oranges and pears that corresponds to the counterfactual's conjecture, and one of no oranges and no pears that corresponds to its presumed facts, to establish at what point in time they consider each one. The results revealed striking individual differences: some participants looked at the negative image and the affirmative one, and some only at the affirmative image. The first experiment showed that participants who looked at the negative image increased their fixation on it within half a second. The second experiment showed they do so even without explicit instructions, and the third showed they do so even for printed words.

摘要

三项实验追踪了参与者的眼动情况,以研究对反事实条件句双重含义的理解时间进程,例如“如果当时有橙子,那么就会有梨”。在视觉世界范式中,参与者听条件句的同时观看图像,其中包括与反事实条件句的推测相对应的橙子和梨的图像,以及与假定事实相对应的没有橙子和没有梨的图像,以此确定他们在什么时间点关注每一幅图像。结果显示出显著的个体差异:一些参与者既看否定图像也看肯定图像,而一些参与者只看肯定图像。第一个实验表明,看否定图像的参与者在半秒内会增加对该图像的注视。第二个实验表明,即使没有明确指示他们也会这样做,第三个实验表明,即使对于印刷文字他们也会这样做。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/9ff3cfb1a943/fpsyg-10-01172-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/7b637ea9e791/fpsyg-10-01172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/c8c606ac9767/fpsyg-10-01172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/ba22d32d52cc/fpsyg-10-01172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/86c6a4fadd94/fpsyg-10-01172-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/dcd3cdd55c7b/fpsyg-10-01172-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/d4789874007d/fpsyg-10-01172-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/8f67510f87b4/fpsyg-10-01172-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/b1f005970592/fpsyg-10-01172-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/9ff3cfb1a943/fpsyg-10-01172-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/7b637ea9e791/fpsyg-10-01172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/c8c606ac9767/fpsyg-10-01172-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/ba22d32d52cc/fpsyg-10-01172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/86c6a4fadd94/fpsyg-10-01172-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/dcd3cdd55c7b/fpsyg-10-01172-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/d4789874007d/fpsyg-10-01172-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/8f67510f87b4/fpsyg-10-01172-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/b1f005970592/fpsyg-10-01172-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c97/6587111/9ff3cfb1a943/fpsyg-10-01172-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
The Comprehension of Counterfactual Conditionals: Evidence From Eye-Tracking in the Visual World Paradigm.反事实条件句的理解:来自视觉世界范式中眼动追踪的证据。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 14;10:1172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01172. eCollection 2019.
2
Similarities and differences in understanding negative and affirmative counterfactuals and causal assertions: Evidence from eye-tracking.理解否定和肯定反事实与因果断言的异同:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Apr;75(4):633-651. doi: 10.1177/17470218211044085. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
3
Thinking About the Opposite of What Is Said: Counterfactual Conditionals and Symbolic or Alternate Simulations of Negation.思考与所说相反的情况:反事实条件句与否定的符号或替代模拟。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):2459-2501. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12677. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
4
Understanding Counterfactuality: A Review of Experimental Evidence for the Dual Meaning of Counterfactuals.理解反事实性:关于反事实陈述双重含义的实验证据综述
Lang Linguist Compass. 2016 Feb;10(2):49-65. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12175. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
5
Exploring Pragmatic Factors on the Logical Relationships of Conditional Reasoning: A Study of Counterfactual and Hypothetical Conditionals.探索语用因素对条件推理逻辑关系的影响:一项关于反事实条件句和假设条件句的研究。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 8;14(8):686. doi: 10.3390/bs14080686.
6
People think about what is true for conditionals, not what is false: only true possibilities prime the comprehension of "if".人们思考的是条件句中为真的情况,而非为假的情况:只有真实的可能性才会促进对“如果”的理解。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Jun;62(6):1072-8. doi: 10.1080/17470210802602375. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
7
Examining the cognitive costs of counterfactual language comprehension: Evidence from ERPs.考察反事实语言理解的认知成本:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Brain Res. 2015 Oct 5;1622:252-69. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
8
Counterfactual and semifactual conditionals prime alternative possibilities.反事实条件句和半事实条件句引发了其他可能性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):1149-54. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1149.
9
Literature reading modulates pronoun resolution in counterfactual world: Evidence from event-related potentials.文学阅读调节反事实世界中的代词消解:来自事件相关电位的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 May;45(5):904-919. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000620. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
10
Eye movements reveal rapid concurrent access to factual and counterfactual interpretations of the world.眼球运动揭示了对世界的事实性和反事实性解释的快速同时获取。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(5):939-61. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.637632. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
"Looking at" Negation: Faster Processing for Symbolic Rather Than Iconic Representations.“看”否定:符号表示比图像表示处理更快。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2021 Dec;50(6):1417-1436. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09797-w. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Thinking About the Opposite of What Is Said: Counterfactual Conditionals and Symbolic or Alternate Simulations of Negation.思考与所说相反的情况:反事实条件句与否定的符号或替代模拟。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):2459-2501. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12677. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
2
Facts and Possibilities: A Model-Based Theory of Sentential Reasoning.事实与可能性:一种基于模型的句子推理理论。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jul 2. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12634.
3
Understanding Counterfactuality: A Review of Experimental Evidence for the Dual Meaning of Counterfactuals.
理解反事实性:关于反事实陈述双重含义的实验证据综述
Lang Linguist Compass. 2016 Feb;10(2):49-65. doi: 10.1111/lnc3.12175. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
4
Pragmatic skills predict online counterfactual comprehension: Evidence from the N400.语用技能可预测在线反事实理解:来自N400的证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct;16(5):814-24. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0433-4.
5
Expertise effects in the Moses illusion: detecting contradictions with stored knowledge.摩西错觉中的专业知识效应:检测与存储知识的矛盾
Memory. 2017 Feb;25(2):220-230. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1152377. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
6
Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings Predict Gaze Within Written Word Arrays: Evidence From a Visual Wor(l)d Paradigm.抽象概念特征评分可预测书面单词数组中的注视:来自视觉单词范式的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41(3):659-685. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12348. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
7
Counterfactual Thought.反事实思维。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:135-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
Negation in context: Evidence from the visual world paradigm.语境中的否定:来自视觉世界范式的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(6):1082-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1063675. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
9
Examining the cognitive costs of counterfactual language comprehension: Evidence from ERPs.考察反事实语言理解的认知成本:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Brain Res. 2015 Oct 5;1622:252-69. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
10
Visual content of words delays negation.词语的视觉内容会延迟否定反应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Nov;153:107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Oct 30.