European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Oct;38(10):2294-2304. doi: 10.1002/etc.4531. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
Multiple mode of action (MOA) frameworks have been developed in aquatic ecotoxicology, mainly based on fish toxicity. These frameworks provide information on a key determinant of chemical toxicity, but the MOA categories and level of specificity remain unique to each of the classification schemes. The present study aimed to develop a consensus MOA assignment within EnviroTox, a curated in vivo aquatic toxicity database, based on the following MOA classification schemes: Verhaar (modified) framework, Assessment Tool for Evaluating Risk, Toxicity Estimation Software Tool, and OASIS. The MOA classifications from each scheme were first collapsed into one of 3 categories: non-specifically acting (i.e., narcosis), specifically acting, or nonclassifiable. Consensus rules were developed based on the degree of concordance among the 4 individual MOA classifications to attribute a consensus MOA to each chemical. A confidence rank was also assigned to the consensus MOA classification based on the degree of consensus. Overall, 40% of the chemicals were classified as narcotics, 17% as specifically acting, and 43% as unclassified. Sixty percent of chemicals had a medium to high consensus MOA assignment. When compared to empirical acute toxicity data, the general trend of specifically acting chemicals being more toxic is clearly observed for both fish and invertebrates but not for algae. EnviroTox is the first approach to establishing a high-level consensus across 4 computationally and structurally distinct MOA classification schemes. This consensus MOA classification provides both a transparent understanding of the variation between MOA classification schemes and an added certainty of the MOA assignment. In terms of regulatory relevance, a reliable understanding of MOA can provide information that can be useful for the prioritization (ranking) and risk assessment of chemicals. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:2294-2304. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.
多作用模式(MOA)框架已在水生生态毒理学中得到发展,主要基于鱼类毒性。这些框架提供了有关化学毒性关键决定因素的信息,但 MOA 类别和特异性水平在每种分类方案中仍然是独特的。本研究旨在根据以下 MOA 分类方案,在经过精心整理的体内水生毒性数据库 EnviroTox 中建立共识 MOA 分配:Verhaar(改良)框架、风险评估工具、毒性估算软件工具和 OASIS。首先,将每个方案的 MOA 分类压缩为以下 3 个类别之一:非特异性作用(即麻醉)、特异性作用或不可分类。根据 4 种单独的 MOA 分类之间的一致性程度制定了共识规则,以便为每种化学物质分配共识 MOA。还根据一致性程度为共识 MOA 分类分配置信度等级。总体而言,40%的化学物质被归类为麻醉剂,17%为特异性作用,43%为不可分类。60%的化学物质具有中高共识 MOA 分配。与经验性急性毒性数据相比,鱼类和无脊椎动物的特异性作用化学物质更有毒的总体趋势非常明显,但藻类则不然。EnviroTox 是第一个在 4 种计算上和结构上不同的 MOA 分类方案之间建立高级共识的方法。这种共识 MOA 分类不仅提供了对 MOA 分类方案之间差异的透明理解,而且还增加了 MOA 分配的确定性。就监管相关性而言,对 MOA 的可靠理解可以提供有用的信息,可用于化学品的优先级(排名)和风险评估。Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:2294-2304。 © 2019 作者。环境毒理学和化学由 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 代表 SETAC 出版。