• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

海水化学毒性能否根据淡水毒性进行预测?基于物种敏感性分布的综合评估。

Can Chemical Toxicity in Saltwater Be Predicted from Toxicity in Freshwater? A Comprehensive Evaluation Using Species Sensitivity Distributions.

机构信息

Center for Marine Environmental Studies, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.

Health and Environmental Risk Research Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Aug;41(8):2021-2027. doi: 10.1002/etc.5354. Epub 2022 May 27.

DOI:10.1002/etc.5354
PMID:35502940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9542858/
Abstract

Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) play an important role in ecological risk assessment. Estimating SSDs requires toxicity data for many species, but reports on saltwater species are often limited compared to freshwater species. This limitation can constrain informed management of saltwater quality for the protection of marine ecosystems. We investigated the relationships between the parameters (i.e., mean and standard deviation [SD]) of freshwater and saltwater log-normal SSDs to determine how accurately saltwater toxicity could be estimated from freshwater toxicity test data. We estimated freshwater and saltwater SSDs for 104 chemicals with reported acute toxicity data for five or more species and compared their means, SDs, and hazardous concentrations for 5% of the species (HC5) derived from the acute SSDs. Standard major axis regression analyses generally showed that log-log relationships between freshwater and saltwater SSD means, SDs, and HC5 values were nearly 1:1. In addition, the ratios of freshwater-to-saltwater SSD means and HC5 values for most of the 104 chemicals fell within the range 0.1-10. Although such a strong correlation was not observed for SSD SDs (r  < 0.5), differences between freshwater and saltwater SSD SDs were relatively small. These results indicate that saltwater acute SSDs can be reasonably estimated using freshwater acute SSDs. Because the differences of the means and SDs between freshwater and saltwater SSDs were larger when the number of test species used for SSD estimation was lower (i.e., five to seven species in the present study), obtaining toxicity data for an adequate number of species will be key to better approximation of a saltwater acute SSD from a freshwater acute SSD for a given chemical. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:2021-2027. © 2022 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

摘要

物种敏感性分布(SSD)在生态风险评估中起着重要作用。估计 SSD 需要许多物种的毒性数据,但与淡水物种相比,海水物种的报告通常有限。这种限制可能会限制对海水质量的明智管理,以保护海洋生态系统。我们研究了淡水和海水对数正态 SSD 参数(即均值和标准差 [SD])之间的关系,以确定从淡水毒性测试数据准确估计海水毒性的程度。我们估计了 104 种具有报告的五种或更多物种急性毒性数据的化学品的淡水和海水 SSD,并比较了它们的均值、SD 和急性 SSD 得出的物种 5%危害浓度(HC5)。标准主要轴回归分析通常表明,淡水和海水 SSD 均值、SD 和 HC5 值之间的对数对关系几乎为 1:1。此外,对于 104 种化学品中的大多数,淡水与海水 SSD 均值和 HC5 值的比值在 0.1-10 范围内。尽管 SSD SD 之间没有观察到如此强的相关性(r<0.5),但淡水和海水 SSD SD 之间的差异相对较小。这些结果表明,可以使用淡水急性 SSD 合理估计海水急性 SSD。由于用于 SSD 估计的测试物种数量较低时(即本研究中的五个到七个物种),淡水和海水 SSD 之间的均值和 SD 差异较大,因此获得足够数量的物种的毒性数据将是从给定化学物质的淡水急性 SSD 更好地近似海水急性 SSD 的关键。环境毒理化学 2022;41:2021-2027。©2022 作者。环境毒理化学由 Wiley 期刊公司代表 SETAC 出版。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6a/9542858/96db85e5042c/ETC-41-2021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6a/9542858/c1a06a7533f2/ETC-41-2021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6a/9542858/96db85e5042c/ETC-41-2021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6a/9542858/c1a06a7533f2/ETC-41-2021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b6a/9542858/96db85e5042c/ETC-41-2021-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Can Chemical Toxicity in Saltwater Be Predicted from Toxicity in Freshwater? A Comprehensive Evaluation Using Species Sensitivity Distributions.海水化学毒性能否根据淡水毒性进行预测?基于物种敏感性分布的综合评估。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Aug;41(8):2021-2027. doi: 10.1002/etc.5354. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Can We Reasonably Predict Chronic Species Sensitivity Distributions from Acute Species Sensitivity Distributions?能否根据急性物种敏感性分布合理预测慢性物种敏感性分布?
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Oct 20;54(20):13131-13136. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03108. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
Characterizing Freshwater Ecotoxicity of More Than 9000 Chemicals by Combining Different Levels of Available Measured Test Data with In Silico Predictions.结合不同层次的可用实测测试数据和计算预测方法,对 9000 多种化学品的淡水生态毒性进行特征描述。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2024 Aug;43(8):1914-1927. doi: 10.1002/etc.5929. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
4
Illustrating a Species Sensitivity Distribution for Nano- and Microplastic Particles Using Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling.利用贝叶斯层次模型为纳米和微塑料颗粒绘制物种敏感性分布。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Apr;41(4):954-960. doi: 10.1002/etc.5295. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems.杀虫剂物种敏感性分布:测试物种选择的重要性及其与水生生态系统的相关性。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Feb;24(2):379-88. doi: 10.1897/04-025r.1.
6
Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.利用种间毒性估算模型增强水生物种敏感性分布。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2014 Mar;33(3):688-95. doi: 10.1002/etc.2456. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
7
Life-cycle studies with 2 marine species and bisphenol A: The mysid shrimp (Americamysis bahia) and sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus).与 2 种海洋物种和双酚 A 的生命周期研究:糠虾(Americamysis bahia)和鲷鱼(Cyprinodon variegatus)。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Feb;37(2):398-410. doi: 10.1002/etc.3957. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
Which distribution to choose for deriving a species sensitivity distribution? Implications from analysis of acute and chronic ecotoxicity data.应选择哪种分布来推导出物种敏感性分布?急性和慢性生态毒性数据分析的启示。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024 Jun 15;278:116379. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116379. Epub 2024 May 6.
9
The difference between temperate and tropical saltwater species' acute sensitivity to chemicals is relatively small.温带和热带咸水物种对化学品的急性敏感性差异相对较小。
Chemosphere. 2014 Jun;105:31-43. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.066. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
10
Comparison of Species Sensitivity Distributions for Sediment-Associated Nonionic Organic Chemicals Through Equilibrium Partitioning Theory and Spiked-Sediment Toxicity Tests with Invertebrates.通过平衡分配理论和用无脊椎动物进行的加标沉积物毒性试验比较沉积物相关非离子有机化学品的物种敏感性分布。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Feb;41(2):462-473. doi: 10.1002/etc.5270. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of model-averaging and single-distribution approaches to estimating species sensitivity distributions and hazardous concentrations for 5% of species.用于估计物种敏感性分布和5%物种的危险浓度的模型平均法和单分布法的比较。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2025 Mar 1;44(3):834-840. doi: 10.1093/etojnl/vgae060.
2
Exploring global oceanic persistence and ecological effects of legacy persistent organic pollutants across five decades.探索过去五十年来遗留持久性有机污染物在全球海洋中的持久性及其生态影响。
Sci Adv. 2024 Sep 27;10(39):eado5534. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ado5534. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Recent Developments in Species Sensitivity Distribution Modeling.物种敏感性分布建模的最新进展。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Feb;40(2):293-308. doi: 10.1002/etc.4925.
2
Can We Reasonably Predict Chronic Species Sensitivity Distributions from Acute Species Sensitivity Distributions?能否根据急性物种敏感性分布合理预测慢性物种敏感性分布?
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Oct 20;54(20):13131-13136. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03108. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
3
Learning from the past and considering the future of chemicals in the environment.从过去中学习并思考未来环境中的化学物质。
Science. 2020 Jan 24;367(6476):384-387. doi: 10.1126/science.aay6637.
4
Bioavailability Assessment of Metals in Freshwater Environments: A Historical Review.淡水环境中金属的生物可给性评估:历史回顾。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020 Jan;39(1):48-59. doi: 10.1002/etc.4558.
5
QSAR-Based Estimation of Species Sensitivity Distribution Parameters: An Exploratory Investigation.基于定量构效关系的物种敏感性分布参数估计:探索性研究。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Dec;38(12):2764-2770. doi: 10.1002/etc.4601. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
6
Quantifying the precision of ecological risk: Conventional assessment factor method vs. species sensitivity distribution method.量化生态风险的精度:传统评估因子法与物种敏感度分布法的比较。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019 Nov 15;183:109494. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109494. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
7
Mode of Action Classifications in the EnviroTox Database: Development and Implementation of a Consensus MOA Classification.EnviroTox 数据库中的作用模式分类:共识作用模式分类的制定与实施。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Oct;38(10):2294-2304. doi: 10.1002/etc.4531. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
8
SSDs Revisited: Part I-A Framework for Sample Size Guidance on Species Sensitivity Distribution Analysis.重新审视 SSD:第 I 部分-A 用于物种敏感性分布分析的样本量指导框架。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Jul;38(7):1514-1525. doi: 10.1002/etc.4445. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
Creation of a Curated Aquatic Toxicology Database: EnviroTox.创建一个精选的水生毒理学数据库:EnviroTox。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 May;38(5):1062-1073. doi: 10.1002/etc.4382. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
10
Species sensitivity distributions for use in environmental protection, assessment, and management of aquatic ecosystems for 12 386 chemicals.物种敏感性分布在保护、评估和管理水生生态系统 12386 种化学物质中的应用。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019 Apr;38(4):905-917. doi: 10.1002/etc.4373.