Departments of Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Departments of Pathology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Oncologist. 2019 Dec;24(12):e1381-e1387. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0113. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
The efficacy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for high-risk endometrial cancer remains unclear. This prompted us to evaluate the sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and false-negative (FN) rate of cervical injection of indocyanine green (ICG) SLN mapping in patients with endometrial cancer.
This prospective interventional study was performed at a single university teaching hospital. Consecutive patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgical staging were included. Cervical injection of ICG and near-infrared SLN identification and biopsy were performed for all study patients followed by systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy, whereas para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients with high-risk histologies. SLN detection rates, sensitivity, NPV, and FN rates were calculated.
Between July 2016 and July 2018, 131 patients were enrolled. The overall SLN detection rate was 93.1%, with a bilateral detection rate of 61.8%. Four positive SLNs were identified in four patients. Lymph node metastasis was observed in four additional patients without positive SLNs. These four patients belonged to a group of patients with a high-risk subtype. Three of the four patients had isolated para-aortic node metastases. In low-risk endometrial cancers, the sensitivity of the SLN technique to identify nodal metastatic disease was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31.0-100), with an NPV and FN rate of 100% (95% CI 95.1-100) and 0%, respectively. In high-risk endometrial cancers, the sensitivity, NPV, and FN rate were 20% (95% CI 1.0-70.1), 83.3% (95% CI 61.8-94.5), and 80%, respectively.
Cervical injection of ICG and SLN mapping yielded a low sensitivity and a high FN rate for the identification of node metastasis in endometrial cancer with high-risk histologies.
The efficacy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for high-risk endometrial cancer remains unclear. This study enrolled 131 patients with early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent cervical injection of indocyanine green SLN mapping followed by systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The key result was that SLN mapping yielded a low sensitivity and a high false-negative rate for the identification of node metastasis in endometrial cancer with high-risk histologies. The SLN strategy in these patients may increase the risk of missed diagnosis of isolated para-aortic node metastases and seems to be unacceptable in clinical practice.
前哨淋巴结(SLN)检测在高危子宫内膜癌中的疗效尚不清楚。这促使我们评估宫颈注射吲哚菁绿(ICG)SLN 检测在子宫内膜癌患者中的敏感性、阴性预测值(NPV)和假阴性(FN)率。
这是一项在单所大学教学医院进行的前瞻性干预性研究。连续纳入接受腹腔镜手术分期的早期子宫内膜癌患者。所有研究患者均行宫颈注射 ICG 和近红外 SLN 识别及活检,随后行系统盆腔淋巴结清扫术,高危组织学患者行腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术。计算 SLN 检出率、敏感性、NPV 和 FN 率。
2016 年 7 月至 2018 年 7 月,共纳入 131 例患者。总体 SLN 检出率为 93.1%,双侧检出率为 61.8%。4 例患者的 4 个 SLN 为阳性。4 例无阳性 SLN 的患者发现淋巴结转移。这 4 例患者属于高危亚型组。其中 3 例患者仅有孤立性腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移。在低危子宫内膜癌中,SLN 技术识别淋巴结转移疾病的敏感性为 100%(95%置信区间 [CI]31.0-100),NPV 和 FN 率分别为 100%(95%CI95.1-100)和 0%。在高危子宫内膜癌中,敏感性、NPV 和 FN 率分别为 20%(95%CI1.0-70.1)、83.3%(95%CI61.8-94.5)和 80%。
宫颈注射 ICG 和 SLN 检测对识别高危组织学类型子宫内膜癌的淋巴结转移的敏感性低,FN 率高。
高危子宫内膜癌的前哨淋巴结(SLN)检测的疗效尚不清楚。本研究纳入 131 例早期子宫内膜癌患者,行宫颈注射吲哚菁绿 SLN 检测,随后行系统盆腔淋巴结清扫术和腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术。主要结果是,SLN 检测对识别高危组织学类型子宫内膜癌的淋巴结转移的敏感性低,FN 率高。在这些患者中,SLN 策略可能会增加漏诊孤立性腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的风险,在临床实践中似乎无法接受。