Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎缓解持续时间的预测因素和最佳持续时间。

Predictors and the optimal duration of sustained remission in rheumatoid arthritis.

机构信息

Medical Faculty, Department of Rheumatology, Marmara University, Pendik, 34890, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;38(11):3033-3039. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04654-7. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine predictors and optimal duration of sustained remission (SR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A total of 428 consecutive patients with RA visiting our clinic routinely between 2012 and 2013 were evaluated. Seventy seven of these patients in DAS28 remission were enrolled and followed up for 62.2 ± 9.9 months. Patients in remission ≥ 6 months (SR) and shorter (non: N-SR) were compared in terms of demographic-clinical data and the psychosocial factors. At enrollment, 1st and 5th years, patients in DAS28, SDAI, and Boolean remission were determined.

RESULTS

Sixty three patients were in SR and 14 in N-SR. Lower baseline DAS28 and HAQ scores, anti-CCP were positive predictors of SR. Although the presence of anxiety, depression, fibromyalgia, and fatigue were lower in the SR group, there was no significance. Patients in DAS28 remission (100%) at baseline reduced to 64% at 1st and 42.6% at 5th years. Patients satisfying SDAI and Boolean remission at these three visits were 49%, 44%, and 32.4% vs 41%, 28%, and 20.6%, respectively. If the duration of remission is defined as 6 months, the remission rates of SDAI at inclusion and fifth years' visits were similar but Boolean remission rates differed significantly and if it is accepted as ≥ 12 months, both the SDAI and Boolean remission rates were not different.

CONCLUSION

Low DAS28 and HAQ scores at baseline, anti-CCP were positive predictors of SR. Instead of 6 months, remission duration for ≥ 12 months would probably help us to predict SR independently from the chosen criteria; Boolean or SDAI.

摘要

目的

确定类风湿关节炎(RA)患者持续缓解(SR)的预测因素和最佳持续时间。

方法

评估了 2012 年至 2013 年期间常规就诊于我院的 428 例连续 RA 患者。其中 77 例 DAS28 缓解患者入组并随访 62.2±9.9 个月。比较缓解≥6 个月(SR)和较短时间(非:N-SR)的患者在人口统计学、临床数据和社会心理因素方面的差异。在入组时、第 1 年和第 5 年,评估患者的 DAS28、SDAI 和布尔缓解情况。

结果

63 例患者处于 SR 状态,14 例患者处于 N-SR 状态。较低的基线 DAS28 和 HAQ 评分、抗 CCP 阳性是 SR 的预测因素。尽管 SR 组的焦虑、抑郁、纤维肌痛和疲劳发生率较低,但无统计学意义。基线 DAS28 缓解(100%)的患者在第 1 年降至 64%,第 5 年降至 42.6%。在这三个时间点满足 SDAI 和布尔缓解标准的患者分别为 49%、44%和 32.4%,而分别为 41%、28%和 20.6%。如果将缓解持续时间定义为 6 个月,则 SDAI 在入组和第 5 年的缓解率相似,但布尔缓解率差异显著;如果接受≥12 个月,则 SDAI 和布尔缓解率无差异。

结论

基线 DAS28 和 HAQ 评分较低、抗 CCP 阳性是 SR 的预测因素。与选择的标准(布尔或 SDAI)相比,缓解持续时间≥12 个月可能有助于我们独立预测 SR。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验