Hale Jason E, Meador Marcie R, Mossad Emad B
Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Sep;29(9):915-919. doi: 10.1111/pan.13692. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
One-lung ventilation is a challenging airway technique in the pediatric population. Multiple airway devices can be employed, but there is no consensus as to the most reliable and physiologically advantageous method. This report is a review of the methods of one-lung ventilation in children in our practice, as well as an analysis of the impact of airway device type, patient age, and duration of lung separation on respiratory mechanics and gas exchange.
The records of all pediatric patients undergoing procedures requiring one-lung ventilation in a single center over an 18-month period were reviewed. Demographics, time required to achieve lung separation (anesthesia ready-time), and duration of one-lung ventilation were collected. Data from arterial blood gas analysis and ventilator parameters were collected at three time points: 15 minutes prior to one-lung ventilation (pre-OLV), 15 minutes after initiation of one-lung ventilation (during OLV), and 15 minutes after one-lung ventilation was ended (post-OLV). Standard equations for calculating compliance, the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to the fraction of inspired oxygen, and the alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient were used.
Forty-six patients were identified with a mean age of 9.3 (inner quartile range 3-15) years. All patients had significant changes in pulmonary function when comparing pre-OLV with during OLV and when comparing during OLV with post-OLV. There were no significant changes from pre- to post-OLV. On further analysis, there were more pronounced changes in compliance and gas exchange in older patients (P = 0.003; 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.14). There was also a significant decrease in post-OLV compliance with a longer duration of OLV (P = 0.018; 95% CI: -0.02 to <-0.01). Airway device type did not have significant impact on the parameters examined.
Our report demonstrates significant changes in lung function during one-lung ventilation. One particular device does not seem to be superior. Though pre-OLV measures of pulmonary function correlate closely with post-OLV, older age and a prolonged duration of one-lung ventilation did impact compliance.
在儿科人群中,单肺通气是一项具有挑战性的气道技术。可采用多种气道装置,但对于最可靠且在生理上最具优势的方法尚无共识。本报告回顾了我们在实践中对儿童进行单肺通气的方法,并分析了气道装置类型、患者年龄和肺隔离持续时间对呼吸力学和气体交换的影响。
回顾了在一个中心18个月期间内所有接受需要单肺通气手术的儿科患者的记录。收集了人口统计学数据、实现肺隔离所需时间(麻醉准备时间)和单肺通气持续时间。在三个时间点收集动脉血气分析和呼吸机参数数据:单肺通气前15分钟(OLV前)、单肺通气开始后15分钟(OLV期间)和单肺通气结束后15分钟(OLV后)。使用计算顺应性、动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数之比以及肺泡 - 动脉氧梯度的标准公式。
确定了46例患者,平均年龄为9.3(四分位间距3 - 15)岁。与OLV前相比,OLV期间以及与OLV后相比,所有患者的肺功能均有显著变化。从OLV前到OLV后没有显著变化。进一步分析发现,老年患者的顺应性和气体交换变化更明显(P = 0.003;95% CI:-0.62至-0.14)。OLV持续时间越长,OLV后的顺应性也显著降低(P = 0.018;95% CI:-0.02至<-0.01)。气道装置类型对所检查的参数没有显著影响。
我们的报告表明,单肺通气期间肺功能有显著变化。一种特定的装置似乎并不具有优越性。虽然OLV前的肺功能测量与OLV后密切相关,但年龄较大和单肺通气持续时间延长确实会影响顺应性。