Extraluminal Placement of a Bronchial Blocker Compared with Carbon Dioxide Artificial Pneumothorax in Infants Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of extraluminal placement of a bronchial blocker compared with carbon dioxide (CO) artificial pneumothorax in infants undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

METHODS

The study involved 33 infants (group A) who underwent one-lung ventilation (OLV) with extraluminal placement of a bronchial blocker and 35 other infants (group B) who underwent CO artificial pneumothorax. Clinical characteristics, the degree of lung collapse, and complications were compared.

RESULTS

The degree of lung collapse in group A was significantly higher than that in group B at T2 and T3. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) of group B was significantly lower than that of group A at 10 min and 30 min after OLV. The partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO) of group B was significantly higher than that of group A at 30 min after OLV. The incidence of hypotension in group B was higher than that in group A.

CONCLUSION

Compared with CO artificial pneumothorax, extraluminal placement of a bronchial blocker is associated with a better degree of lung collapse, fewer episodes of hypotension, and lower PaCO accumulation during OLV in infants undergoing VATS.