Department of Shizuoka Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Tokoha University, Shizuoka, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019 Dec;26(18):1931-1940. doi: 10.1177/2047487319859974. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
The efficacy and safety of cardiac rehabilitation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who restored sinus rhythm after catheter ablation remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of cardiac rehabilitation on exercise capacity, inflammatory status, cardiac function, and safety in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who had catheter ablation.
In this randomized controlled study, 61 patients treated with catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (male, 80%; mean age, 66 ± 9 years) were analyzed. Thirty patients underwent cardiac rehabilitation (rehabilitation group), whereas the remaining 31 patients received usual care (usual care group). The rehabilitation group underwent endurance and resistance training with moderate intensity, at least three times per week for six months. Six-minute walk distance, muscle strength, serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, plasma pentraxin 3, left ventricular ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation recurrence were assessed at baseline and at six-month follow-up.
In the rehabilitation group, significant increases in the six-minute walk distance, handgrip strength, leg strength and left ventricular ejection fraction and significant decreases in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and plasma pentraxin 3 concentrations were observed at six-month follow-up compared with baseline (all < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in the usual care group. During the six-month follow-up period, the number of patients with atrial fibrillation recurrence was six (21.4%) in the rehabilitation group and eight (25.8%) in the usual care group (risk ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 2.10).
Cardiac rehabilitation improved exercise capacity without increasing the risk for atrial fibrillation recurrence. It may also be effective in managing systemic inflammatory status and systolic left ventricular function in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation treated with catheter ablation.
对于经导管消融恢复窦性心律后持续性心房颤动患者的心脏康复的疗效和安全性仍不清楚。本研究旨在评估心脏康复对接受导管消融治疗持续性心房颤动患者的运动能力、炎症状态、心功能和安全性的影响。
在这项随机对照研究中,分析了 61 例因持续性心房颤动而行导管消融治疗的患者(男性 80%;平均年龄 66±9 岁)。30 例患者接受心脏康复(康复组),其余 31 例患者接受常规护理(常规护理组)。康复组接受中等强度的耐力和阻力训练,每周至少 3 次,持续 6 个月。在基线和 6 个月随访时评估 6 分钟步行距离、肌肉力量、血清高敏 C 反应蛋白、血浆 pentraxin 3、左心室射血分数和心房颤动复发情况。
与基线相比,康复组在 6 个月随访时的 6 分钟步行距离、手握力、腿部力量和左心室射血分数显著增加,高敏 C 反应蛋白和血浆 pentraxin 3 浓度显著降低(均 P<0.05)。常规护理组无显著变化。在 6 个月随访期间,康复组有 6 例(21.4%)患者发生心房颤动复发,常规护理组有 8 例(25.8%)患者发生心房颤动复发(风险比,0.83;95%置信区间,0.33 至 2.10)。
心脏康复可提高运动能力,且不增加心房颤动复发的风险。对于接受导管消融治疗的持续性心房颤动患者,它可能还有效改善全身炎症状态和左心室收缩功能。