Suppr超能文献

竖脊肌平面阻滞在小儿择期手术中的镇痛效果和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的 Meta 分析。

Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2024 Nov;98:111575. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111575. Epub 2024 Aug 10.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is commonly used for perioperative analgesia in adults; however, its analgesic efficacy and safety in pediatric patients remain uncertain. This review aimed to determine whether ultrasound-guided ESPB can improve analgesic efficacy and safety in pediatric surgery.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

SETTING

Perioperative setting.

PATIENTS

Pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, KoreaMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for eligible published randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing ESPB with controls (no block or other block) in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption after surgery. Other outcomes included intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first request for rescue analgesia, number of patients requiring rescue analgesics, and pain scores after surgery. The safety outcomes were the incidences of bradycardia, hypotension, and postoperative vomiting.

MAIN RESULTS

The analysis included 17 RCTs comprising 919 participants: 461 in the ESPB group, 269 in the no-block group (no block/sham block), and 189 in the other block group. Compared with the control group (no block and other blocks), ESPB significantly reduced the cumulative opioid consumption (intravenous morphine milligram equivalents) after surgery (standardized mean difference = -1.51; 95% confidence interval, -2.39 to -0.64; P = 0.0002; I = 92.9%) and intraoperative opioid consumption, and lowered average pain scores up to 24 h after surgery. ESPB extended the time to the first request for rescue analgesia and decreased the number of patients requiring rescue analgesics. Furthermore, ESPB lowered the pain score at most time points for 24 h after surgery, improved parental satisfaction, and reduced the incidence of postoperative vomiting compared with that in no block/sham block.

CONCLUSIONS

ESPB provides effective and safe perioperative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

摘要

研究目的

超声引导竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)常用于成人围手术期镇痛;然而,其在儿科患者中的镇痛效果和安全性仍不确定。本综述旨在确定超声引导 ESPB 是否能提高小儿手术的镇痛效果和安全性。

设计

随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

设置

围手术期。

患者

接受全身麻醉下择期手术的儿科患者。

干预措施

我们检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、韩国医学文献数据库、Web of Science、Scopus 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库,以获取比较全身麻醉下择期手术的儿科患者接受 ESPB 与对照组(无阻滞或其他阻滞)的随机对照研究(RCT)。

测量

主要结局是术后累积阿片类药物消耗量。其他结局包括术中阿片类药物消耗量、首次要求解救性镇痛的时间、需要解救性镇痛的患者人数和术后疼痛评分。安全性结局是心动过缓、低血压和术后呕吐的发生率。

主要结果

分析纳入了 17 项 RCT,共 919 名参与者:461 名在 ESPB 组,269 名在无阻滞组(无阻滞/假阻滞),189 名在其他阻滞组。与对照组(无阻滞和其他阻滞)相比,ESPB 显著减少了术后累积阿片类药物消耗(静脉注射吗啡毫克当量)(标准化均数差=-1.51;95%置信区间:-2.39 至-0.64;P=0.0002;I=92.9%)和术中阿片类药物消耗,并降低了术后 24 小时内的平均疼痛评分。ESPB 延长了首次要求解救性镇痛的时间,并减少了需要解救性镇痛的患者人数。此外,ESPB 降低了术后 24 小时内大多数时间点的疼痛评分,提高了父母满意度,并降低了术后呕吐的发生率,与无阻滞/假阻滞相比。

结论

ESPB 可为接受全身麻醉下择期手术的儿科患者提供有效和安全的围手术期镇痛。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验