Suppr超能文献

射血分数改善在心力衰竭中的频率、预测因素和预后:一项基于超声心动图的注册研究。

Frequency, predictors, and prognosis of ejection fraction improvement in heart failure: an echocardiogram-based registry study.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary and Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 1;40(26):2110-2117. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz233.

Abstract

AIMS

To identify variables predicting ejection fraction (EF) recovery and characterize prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients with EF recovery (HFrecEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Retrospective study of adults referred for ≥2 echocardiograms separated by ≥6 months between 2008 and 2016 at the two largest echocardiography centres in Alberta who also had physician-assigned diagnosis of HF. Of 10 641 patients, 3124 had heart failure reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (EF ≤ 40%) at baseline: while mean EF declined from 30.2% on initial echocardiogram to 28.6% on the second echocardiogram in those patients with persistent HFrEF (defined by <10% improvement in EF), it improved from 26.1% to 46.4% in the 1174 patients (37.6%) with HFrecEF (defined by EF absolute improvement ≥10%). On multivariate analysis, female sex [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-1.96], younger age (aOR per decade 1.16, 95% CI 1.09-1.23), atrial fibrillation (aOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.68-2.38), cancer (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03-2.26), hypertension (aOR 1.38, 95% CI 1.18-1.62), lower baseline ejection fraction (aOR per 1% decrease 1.07 (1.06-1.08), and using hydralazine (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.19-2.40) were associated with EF improvements ≥10%. HFrecEF patients demonstrated lower rates per 1000 patient years of mortality (106 vs. 164, adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 0.70 [0.62-0.79]), all-cause hospitalizations (300 vs. 428, aHR 0.87 [0.79-0.95]), all-cause emergency room (ER) visits (569 vs. 799, aHR 0.88 [0.81-0.95]), and cardiac transplantation or left ventricular assist device implantation (2 vs. 10, aHR 0.21 [0.10-0.45]) compared to patients with persistent HFrEF. Females with HFrEF exhibited lower mortality risk (aHR 0.94 [0.88-0.99]) than males after adjusting for age, time between echocardiograms, clinical comorbidities, medications, and whether their EF improved or not during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

HFrecEF patients tended to be younger, female, and were more likely to have hypertension, atrial fibrillation, or cancer. HFrecEF patients have a substantially better prognosis compared to those with persistent HFrEF, even after multivariable adjustment, and female patients exhibit lower mortality risk than men within each subgroup (HFrecEF and persistent HFrEF) even after multivariable adjustment.

摘要

目的

确定预测射血分数(EF)恢复的变量,并描述 EF 恢复的心力衰竭(HF)患者(HFrecEF)的预后特征。

方法和结果

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2008 年至 2016 年在阿尔伯塔省最大的两个超声心动图中心接受至少 2 次超声心动图检查且两次检查间隔至少 6 个月的成年人,这些患者的医生诊断为心力衰竭。在 10641 例患者中,3124 例基线时为射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)(EF≤40%):在持续 HFrEF 患者(EF 改善<10%定义)中,初始超声心动图上的平均 EF 从 30.2%下降至第二次超声心动图上的 28.6%,而在 1174 例 EFrecEF 患者(EF 绝对值改善≥10%定义)中,EF 从 26.1%提高至 46.4%。多变量分析显示,女性(调整后优势比[aOR] 1.66,95%置信区间[CI] 1.40-1.96)、年龄较小(每 10 岁 aOR 为 1.16,95%CI 为 1.09-1.23)、心房颤动(aOR 2.00,95%CI 1.68-2.38)、癌症(aOR 1.52,95%CI 1.03-2.26)、高血压(aOR 1.38,95%CI 1.18-1.62)、较低的基线 EF(每降低 1%EF 的 aOR 为 1.07[1.06-1.08])和使用肼屈嗪(aOR 1.69,95%CI 1.19-2.40)与 EF 改善≥10%相关。EFrecEF 患者每 1000 患者年死亡率(106 例 vs. 164 例,调整后的危险比[aHR] 0.70[0.62-0.79])、全因住院率(300 例 vs. 428 例,aHR 0.87[0.79-0.95])、全因急诊就诊率(569 例 vs. 799 例,aHR 0.88[0.81-0.95])和心脏移植或左心室辅助装置植入率(2 例 vs. 10 例,aHR 0.21[0.10-0.45])均低于持续 HFrEF 患者。在调整年龄、超声心动图检查之间的时间、临床合并症、药物以及 EF 在随访期间是否改善后,HFrEF 女性的死亡率风险(aHR 0.94[0.88-0.99])低于男性。

结论

EFrecEF 患者往往更年轻、女性,更有可能患有高血压、心房颤动或癌症。EFrecEF 患者的预后明显优于持续 HFrEF 患者,即使在多变量调整后也是如此,并且在每个亚组(EFrecEF 和持续 HFrEF)中,女性的死亡率风险均低于男性,即使在多变量调整后也是如此。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验