Suppr超能文献

望而不见?在线民族志的实践与伦理理论探讨。

Looking, But Not Listening? Theorizing the Practice and Ethics of Online Ethnography.

机构信息

University of Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Feb-Apr;15(1-2):55-62. doi: 10.1177/1556264619857529. Epub 2019 Jul 7.

Abstract

There are debates across disciplines regarding how to research and represent digital cultures ethically. Against this background, there is a need to reflect on the practice and ethics of online ethnography. Ambiguities surrounding researcher "participation" online have led this to be equated largely with observation. This has deprivileged the act of listening in both research practice and the methodological and ethical debates that underpin this. Utilizing ethnographic research into self-harm and social media as a critical lens, this article advocates for listening as a mode of participating in, as well as observing, online spaces. In proposing "active listening" and "adaptive listening" to explore the polyphonic and heterogeneous nature of social media, we argue that listening is key to representing online spaces in all their cultural diversity and emotional complexity. Reflecting on listening is necessary to forging a practical ethics of online ethnography, and is relevant to digital research more widely.

摘要

在跨学科领域,存在着关于如何进行道德的数字文化研究和呈现的争论。在此背景下,我们需要反思在线民族志的实践和伦理。由于研究人员在网上的“参与”存在模糊性,这在很大程度上等同于观察。这种情况使研究实践以及为这一实践提供支持的方法学和伦理辩论中倾听的行为失去了优势。本文利用对自我伤害和社交媒体的民族志研究作为批判视角,倡导将倾听作为一种参与以及观察在线空间的模式。通过提出“主动倾听”和“适应性倾听”来探索社交媒体的多音性和异质性,我们认为,倾听是在线空间在其文化多样性和情感复杂性方面得以呈现的关键。对倾听进行反思是构建在线民族志实践伦理的必要条件,并且与更广泛的数字研究相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验