Suppr超能文献

体力劳动就业标准的历史视角。

Historical perspective on physical employment standards.

作者信息

Gebhardt Deborah L

机构信息

Human Resources Research Organization (HumRRO), Alexandria, VA, USA.

出版信息

Work. 2019;63(4):481-494. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192964.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

When one thinks of jobs with physical employment standards, the first thoughts typically center around firefighting, law enforcement, and military jobs. However, there are 100s of arduous jobs that exist in the public and private sectors that range from moderately demanding to strenuous. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 28% of the workforce in the United States performs physically demanding jobs that involve construction, machinery installation and repair, public safety, and other professions.

OBJECTIVE

This paper provides a historical perspective of physical employment standards for hiring workers into these arduous jobs, how we arrived at our current knowledge base, and the challenges faced today when determining and implementing physical employment standards.

METHOD

This narrative review draws on evidence from 62 published sources.

RESULTS

This paper focuses on the need for a multidisciplinary approach to identifying job requirements, the professions (e.g., medical, psychology, physiology) that underpin the methodologies, and the knowledge used by current researchers. Descriptions of test and cut score development, legal issues, and challenges for the future also are highlighted.

摘要

背景

当人们想到有体能要求标准的工作时,首先想到的通常是消防、执法和军事工作。然而,在公共和私营部门存在着数百种艰苦工作,其难度从中等要求到高强度不等。美国劳工统计局报告称,美国28%的劳动力从事涉及建筑、机械安装与维修、公共安全及其他职业的体力要求较高的工作。

目的

本文提供了一个历史视角,介绍了在招聘工人从事这些艰苦工作时体能要求标准的情况、我们如何形成当前的知识基础,以及当今在确定和实施体能要求标准时所面临的挑战。

方法

本叙述性综述借鉴了62篇已发表文献的证据。

结果

本文重点关注采用多学科方法确定工作要求的必要性、支撑这些方法的专业领域(如医学、心理学、生理学)以及当前研究人员所使用的知识。还突出了对测试和分数线制定、法律问题以及未来挑战的描述。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验