• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当来源诚实地提供他们有偏见的观点时:作为一种独特的来源感知,偏见对可信度和说服力有独立的影响。

When Sources Honestly Provide Their Biased Opinion: Bias as a Distinct Source Perception With Independent Effects on Credibility and Persuasion.

机构信息

The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Mar;46(3):439-453. doi: 10.1177/0146167219858654. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1177/0146167219858654
PMID:31282841
Abstract

Anecdotally, attributions that others are biased pervade many domains. Yet, research examining the effects of perceptions of bias is sparse, possibly due to some prior researchers conflating bias with untrustworthiness. We sought to demonstrate that perceptions of bias and untrustworthiness are separable and have independent effects. The current work examines these differences in the persuasion domain, but this distinction has implications for other domains as well. Two experiments clarify the conceptual distinction between bias (skewed perception) and untrustworthiness (dishonesty) and three studies demonstrate that source bias can have a negative effect on persuasion and source credibility beyond any parallel effects of untrustworthiness, lack of expertise, and dislikability. The current work suggests that bias is an independent, but understudied source characteristic.

摘要

人们常说,在许多领域,人们认为他人有偏见。然而,研究偏见感知影响的研究很少,这可能是由于一些先前的研究人员将偏见与不可信混为一谈。我们试图证明偏见和不可信的感知是可分离的,并且具有独立的影响。当前的工作在说服领域研究了这些差异,但这种区别对于其他领域也有意义。两项实验澄清了偏见(有偏差的感知)和不可信(不诚实)之间的概念区别,三项研究表明,除了不可信、缺乏专业知识和不受欢迎等平行影响之外,来源偏见会对说服和来源可信度产生负面影响。当前的工作表明,偏见是一个独立但研究不足的来源特征。

相似文献

1
When Sources Honestly Provide Their Biased Opinion: Bias as a Distinct Source Perception With Independent Effects on Credibility and Persuasion.当来源诚实地提供他们有偏见的观点时:作为一种独特的来源感知,偏见对可信度和说服力有独立的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Mar;46(3):439-453. doi: 10.1177/0146167219858654. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
2
Influences of source bias that differ from source untrustworthiness: When flip-flopping is more and less surprising.来源偏见与来源不可信的影响不同:当翻转更令人惊讶和不令人惊讶时。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Apr;118(4):603-616. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000181. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
Influences of Position Justification on Perceived Bias: Immediate Effects and Carryover Across Persuasive Messages.立场正当性对感知偏差的影响:即时效应及跨说服性信息的延续效应
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jul;47(7):1188-1204. doi: 10.1177/0146167220963678. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Recognizing and Trusting Persuasion Agents: Attitudes Bias Trustworthiness Judgments, but not Persuasion Detection.识别和信任说服者:态度偏见信任判断,但不影响说服力判断。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 May;47(5):796-809. doi: 10.1177/0146167220946197. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
5
Consider the source: persuasion of implicit evaluations is moderated by source credibility.考虑来源:隐含评价的说服受来源可信度的调节。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Feb;39(2):193-205. doi: 10.1177/0146167212472374.
6
Using Power as a Negative Cue: How Conspiracy Mentality Affects Epistemic Trust in Sources of Historical Knowledge.利用权力作为负面线索:阴谋心态如何影响对历史知识来源的认知信任。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Sep;44(9):1364-1379. doi: 10.1177/0146167218768779. Epub 2018 May 2.
7
Source expertise and persuasion: the effects of perceived opposition or support on message scrutiny.信息源专长和说服力:感知到的反对或支持对信息审查的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Jan;38(1):90-100. doi: 10.1177/0146167211420733. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
8
Lay concepts of source likeability, trustworthiness, expertise, and power: A prototype analysis.来源可信度、可靠性、专业性和权力等概念的外显观点:一项原型分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Jun;53(3):1188-1201. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01478-1. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
9
Can Self-Persuasion Reduce Hostile Attribution Bias in Young Children?自我说服能否减少幼儿的敌意归因偏差?
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Jun;47(6):989-1000. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0499-2.
10
Facial trustworthiness perception bias elevated in individuals with PTSD compared to trauma exposed controls.与经历过创伤的对照组相比,患有 PTSD 的个体对面部可信度的感知存在偏差。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Mar 30;237:43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.01.056. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
How AI sources can increase openness to opposing views.人工智能资源如何能够增强对反对观点的开放性。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 17;15(1):17170. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00791-z.
2
Relevance theory for mapping cognitive biases in fact-checking: an argumentative approach.用于在事实核查中映射认知偏差的关联理论:一种论证方法。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 12;15:1468879. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1468879. eCollection 2024.
3
The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility.社会线索和来源效应对错误信息易感性的说服效果。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 20;14(1):4205. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54030-y.
4
Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions.持续影响的机制:错误信息纠正对来源感知的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Aug;51(6):1317-1330. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01402-w. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
The independent effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on retraction believability: The moderating role of vested interest.来源专业性和可信度对撤回可信度的独立影响:既得利益的调节作用。
Mem Cognit. 2023 May;51(4):845-861. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01374-3. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
6
Count on trust: the indirect effect of trust in government on policy compliance with health behavior instructions.依靠信任:政府信任对健康行为指令政策遵守情况的间接影响。
Policy Sci. 2022;55(4):593-630. doi: 10.1007/s11077-022-09481-3. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
7
Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?为什么人们会反科学,我们能对此做些什么?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jul 26;119(30):e2120755119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120755119. Epub 2022 Jul 12.