Department of Oncology, Mario Negri IRCCS Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy.
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Cancer. 2019 Nov 1;125(21):3776-3789. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32375. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
Targeted therapies (TT), combination immunotherapy (CMI), and monoimmunotherapy (MI) in combination with radiotherapy (CRI) or not are commonly used in patients with melanoma brain metastases, but studies that directly compare these strategies are lacking. The current meta-analysis aimed to better elucidate their activity and efficacy.
A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and conference proceedings up to January 2019 was performed to identify trials investigating combination TT, monotargeted TT (mono TT), MI, CMI, and CRI in melanoma brain metastases. The outcomes considered were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the objective response rate (ORR) as evaluated at both intracranial and extracranial sites. Random effects models were used to compare the different therapeutic strategies.
A total of 15 trials were included that provided 1132 patients for analyses. CMI demonstrated a statistically significant better OS compared with MI (P = .03, P = .05, and P = .03, respectively, at 6 months, 18 months, and 24 months) and combination TT (P = .04 and P = .03, respectively, at 18 months and 24 months). CMI demonstrated a statistically significant better PFS compared with combination TT (P < .001 at 12 months and 18 months), MI (P = .02, P < .02, and P = .05, respectively, at 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months), and mono TT (P < .001 at 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months). The intracranial objective response rate was higher with CMI compared with mono TT (P < .001) and MI (P < .001), whereas there was no difference between CMI and combination TT.
The results of the current meta-analysis suggested that CMI increases long-term PFS and OS compared with MI and combination TT. Combination TT and CMI are associated with a similar intracranial response rate. The role of systemic therapy in combination with radiotherapy remains to be better elucidated.
在患有黑色素瘤脑转移的患者中,靶向治疗(TT)、联合免疫治疗(CMI)和单免疫治疗(MI)联合或不联合放射治疗(CRI)通常被使用,但缺乏直接比较这些策略的研究。目前的荟萃分析旨在更好地阐明它们的活性和疗效。
对 MEDLINE、Embase 和会议记录进行了系统检索,检索截至 2019 年 1 月,以确定研究黑色素瘤脑转移中联合 TT、单靶 TT(单 TT)、MI、CMI 和 CRI 的试验。考虑的结果是无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和颅内和颅外部位评估的客观缓解率(ORR)。使用随机效应模型比较不同的治疗策略。
共纳入 15 项试验,共 1132 例患者纳入分析。CMI 与 MI(6 个月、18 个月和 24 个月时 P 分别为.03、.05 和.03)和联合 TT(18 个月和 24 个月时 P 分别为.04 和.03)相比,OS 有统计学意义的改善。CMI 与联合 TT(12 个月和 18 个月时 P <.001)、MI(6 个月、12 个月和 18 个月时 P 分别为.02、<.02 和.05)相比,PFS 有统计学意义的改善。与单 TT(6 个月、12 个月和 18 个月时 P <.001)相比,CMI 的颅内客观缓解率更高。
目前荟萃分析的结果表明,与 MI 和联合 TT 相比,CMI 增加了长期 PFS 和 OS。联合 TT 和 CMI 颅内反应率相似。全身治疗联合放疗的作用仍需进一步阐明。