Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
Department of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;14(3):263-274. doi: 10.1111/eip.12849. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
This paper aims to investigate the extent to which mindfulness-based interventions serve to reduce anxiety in children and adolescents. A heterogeneous sample was used, including clinical and non-clinical population.
A literature search of controlled intervention studies published up to December 31, 2016, was carried out in PubMed, Lilacs, Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo, Opengrey and Teseo databases. The effect size was calculated by Cohen's d. The Cochran Q statistic and the I index were used for the study of heterogeneity. An analysis was conducted using the random effects model.
829 articles were identified, of which 18 were finally selected. Of these, only three had statistically significant effect sizes. The overall combined result obtained was .013, but it did not result statistically significant (CI95% [-.102, .128].) The Q statistic was statistically significant (Q [18] = 28.497, P = . 39) and the I index was 40.34%, indicating a moderate heterogeneity.
This meta-analysis did not obtain statistically significant results that could provide conclusions. In general, the studies analysed are small, of low power and have a marked heterogeneity, which implies that the findings are provisional and need to be supported by more robust studies. Although it cannot be ruled out that mindfulness-based interventions are not effective in the infant-juvenile population, it is also possible that this effect could not be detected due to the limited number of available studies. Larger investigations are needed, with sufficient statistical power and designs that control the variables potentially moderating, to establish clear conclusions.
本文旨在探讨正念干预对减少儿童和青少年焦虑的程度。使用了异质样本,包括临床和非临床人群。
在 PubMed、Lilacs、Cochrane、Embase、PsycInfo、OpenGrey 和 Teseo 数据库中进行了截至 2016 年 12 月 31 日发表的对照干预研究的文献检索。使用 Cohen's d 计算效应大小。使用 Cochran Q 统计量和 I 指数研究异质性。使用随机效应模型进行分析。
共确定了 829 篇文章,其中最终选择了 18 篇。其中只有 3 篇具有统计学显著的效应大小。总体合并结果为.013,但无统计学意义(CI95% [-.102,.128])。Q 统计量具有统计学意义(Q [18] = 28.497,P =.39),I 指数为 40.34%,表明存在中度异质性。
这项荟萃分析没有获得统计学上显著的结果,无法得出结论。总体而言,分析的研究规模较小,效能较低,异质性显著,这意味着这些发现是暂定的,需要更多稳健的研究来支持。虽然不能排除正念干预对婴儿-青少年人群无效,但由于可用研究数量有限,也可能无法检测到这种效果。需要进行更大规模的调查,具有足够的统计效能和设计,以控制潜在的调节变量,从而得出明确的结论。