• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评价诺森伯兰郡的全科医生实践中使用的转诊管理系统(RMS):一项定性研究。

Evaluation of the referral management systems (RMS) used by GP practices in Northumberland: a qualitative study.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e028436. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028436.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028436
PMID:31289080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6629383/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Exploring the views of stakeholders to the referral management systems (RMS) used by GP practices in Northumberland, UK to evaluate its perceived effectiveness.

DESIGN

This was an in-depth qualitative semi-structured interview study.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

32 participants (GPs, hospital consultants, referral support, hospital managers, Clinical Commissioning Group manager) in the North East of England, UK.

METHOD

Interviews using a grounded theory approach and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The main benefit of RMS mentioned by participants was that it allowed for unnecessary referrals to be vetted by consultants, and helps ensure patients are sent to the correct clinic. Generally, the consultants in our study felt that RMS did not significantly help them reject referrals. Some GPs experienced that RMS undermined GP autonomy and did not help when they had exhausted their abilities to manage a patient in primary care, and it was suggested that in some cases RMS may delay rather than prevent a referral. The main perceived disadvantage of RMS was the additional workload for GPs and consultants, and RMS was felt to be a barrier to commutation between GPs and consultants. Frustration with the system design and lack of knowledge of its cost-effectiveness were articulated.

CONCLUSION

Although RMS was reported to reduce some unnecessary referrals, the effect of referral delay and rejection is unknown. Although there were some positive attributes described, RMS was mostly received negatively by the stakeholders.

摘要

目的

探讨利益相关者对英国诺森伯兰郡 GP 诊所使用的转诊管理系统(RMS)的看法,以评估其感知效果。

设计

这是一项深入的定性半结构化访谈研究。

参与者和设置

英国东北部的 32 名参与者(全科医生、医院顾问、转诊支持人员、医院管理人员、临床委托组经理)。

方法

使用扎根理论方法和主题分析进行访谈。

结果

参与者提到的 RMS 的主要好处是,它允许顾问对不必要的转诊进行审查,并有助于确保患者被送到正确的诊所。总的来说,我们研究中的顾问认为 RMS 并没有显著帮助他们拒绝转诊。一些全科医生认为 RMS 损害了全科医生的自主权,并且在他们已经用尽了在初级保健中管理患者的能力时,也没有帮助,有人建议在某些情况下,RMS 可能会延迟而不是阻止转诊。RMS 的主要被认为的缺点是增加了全科医生和顾问的工作量,并且被认为是全科医生和顾问之间交流的障碍。对系统设计的不满和对其成本效益的缺乏了解都被表达了出来。

结论

尽管 RMS 被报道可以减少一些不必要的转诊,但转诊延迟和拒绝的影响尚不清楚。尽管描述了一些积极的属性,但 RMS 主要还是被利益相关者负面评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea15/6629383/7af8d6990bbf/bmjopen-2018-028436f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea15/6629383/7af8d6990bbf/bmjopen-2018-028436f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea15/6629383/7af8d6990bbf/bmjopen-2018-028436f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the referral management systems (RMS) used by GP practices in Northumberland: a qualitative study.评价诺森伯兰郡的全科医生实践中使用的转诊管理系统(RMS):一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e028436. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028436.
2
Referrals from general practice to consultants in Germany: if the GP is the initiator, patients' experiences are more positive.德国从全科医疗向专科医生的转诊:如果全科医生是转诊的发起者,患者的体验会更积极。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jan 19;6:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-5.
3
The consultants' role in the referring process with general practitioners: partners or adjudicators? a qualitative study.顾问在全科医生转诊过程中的角色:是伙伴还是裁决者?一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 11;14:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-153.
4
GP views on strategies to cope with increasing workload: a qualitative interview study.全科医生对应对工作量增加策略的看法:一项定性访谈研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Feb;67(655):e148-e156. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X688861. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
5
Referral management centres as a means of reducing outpatients attendances: how do they work and what influences successful implementation and perceived effectiveness?作为减少门诊就诊人数的一种方式的转诊管理中心:它们是如何运作的,哪些因素会影响其成功实施和感知效果?
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Mar 24;17:37. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0434-y.
6
The relationship between GPs and hospital consultants and the implications for patient care: a qualitative study.全科医生与医院顾问之间的关系及其对患者护理的影响:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Apr 14;17:45. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0442-y.
7
Medical overuse and quaternary prevention in primary care - A qualitative study with general practitioners.基层医疗中的医疗过度使用与四级预防——一项针对全科医生的定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Dec 8;18(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0667-4.
8
Evaluation of specialists' outreach clinics in general practice in England: process and acceptability to patients, specialists, and general practitioners.英格兰全科医疗中专科医生外展诊所的评估:患者、专科医生和全科医生的流程及可接受性
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Feb;51(1):52-61. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.1.52.
9
How to decide adequately? Qualitative study of GPs' view on decision-making in self-referred and physician-referred emergency department consultations in Berlin, Germany.如何做出充分的决策?德国柏林全科医生对自行就诊和医生转诊急诊就诊决策的看法的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e026786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026786.
10
Consultants' and referrers' perceived barriers to closing the cross-institutional referral loop, and perceived impact on clinical care.顾问和转介者认为阻碍关闭机构间转介循环的因素,以及对临床护理的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 Dec;180:105265. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105265. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Agreement and consistency in the triaging of musculoskeletal primary care referrals by vetting clinicians using a knowledge-based triage tool.使用基于知识的分诊工具,由筛选临床医生对肌肉骨骼初级保健转诊进行分诊时的一致性和一致性。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023 Oct 26;24:e63. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000361.

本文引用的文献

1
BMA annual meeting: The BMA will lobby for the abolition of referral management systems.英国医学协会年会:英国医学协会将游说废除转诊管理系统。
BMJ. 2017 Jun 27;357:j3090. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3090.
2
Private firms run a third of CCGs' schemes to screen GP referrals.私人公司运营着临床委托小组(CCG)三分之一的全科医生转诊筛查计划。
BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6855.
3
Referral management schemes: good for whom?转诊管理方案:对谁有益?
BMJ. 2017 Jan 4;356:i6856. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i6856.
4
Improving the effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient services: a scoping review of interventions at the primary-secondary care interface.提高门诊服务的有效性和效率:对初级保健与二级保健衔接处干预措施的范围综述
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2017 Jan;22(1):53-64. doi: 10.1177/1355819616648982. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
5
Email communication at the medical primary-secondary care interface: a qualitative exploration.基层医疗与二级医疗衔接中的电子邮件沟通:一项质性探索
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jul;66(648):e467-73. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X685273. Epub 2016 May 9.
6
Views of general practitioners and head and neck surgeons on the referral system for suspected cancer: a survey.全科医生和头颈外科医生对疑似癌症转诊系统的看法:一项调查。
J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Sep;129(9):893-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115001723. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
7
An evidence-based referral management system: insights from a pilot study.一个基于证据的转诊管理系统:一项试点研究的见解。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 Jul;16(4):407-14. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000395. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
8
The consultants' role in the referring process with general practitioners: partners or adjudicators? a qualitative study.顾问在全科医生转诊过程中的角色:是伙伴还是裁决者?一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 11;14:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-153.
9
Do referral-management schemes reduce hospital outpatient attendances? Time-series evaluation of primary care referral management.转诊管理方案是否会减少医院门诊就诊人次?初级保健转诊管理的时间序列评估。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jun;63(611):e386-92. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X668177.
10
Practical health co-operation - the impact of a referral template on quality of care and health care co-operation: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.实用健康合作 - 转诊模板对医疗质量和医疗合作的影响:一项群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Jan 7;14:7. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-7.