Suppr超能文献

NHS 中的患者安全监管:绘制医疗保健监管格局图。

Patient safety regulation in the NHS: mapping the regulatory landscape of healthcare.

机构信息

Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Jane Carthey Consulting, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e028663. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028663.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The current research project sought to map out the regulatory landscape for patient safety in the English National Health Service (NHS).

METHOD

We used a systematic desk-based search using a variety of sources to identify the total number of organisations with regulatory influence in the NHS; we researched publicly available documents listing external inspection agencies, participated in advisory consultations with NHS regulatory compliance teams and reviewed the websites of all regulatory agencies.

RESULTS

Our mapping revealed over 126 organisations who exert some regulatory influence on NHS provider organisations in addition to 211 Clinical Commissioning Groups. The majority of these organisations set standards and collect data from provider organisations and a considerable number carry out investigations. We found a multitude of overlapping functions and activities. The variability in approach and overlapping functions suggest that there is no overall integrated regulatory approach.

CONCLUSION

Regulation potentially provides a variety of benefits in terms of maintaining the safety and quality of care by providing an external perspective on the care being delivered. However, the variability, extent and fragmentation of the regulatory system of the NHS make it hard for regulators to act effectively and places a massive burden on NHS provider organisations. Overlapping regulatory requests may distract locally driven initiatives to improve safety and quality. Further research is needed to understand the full extent of regulatory activity and the true benefits and costs incurred.

摘要

目的

本研究项目旨在描绘英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中患者安全的监管格局。

方法

我们使用系统的案头搜索,利用各种来源来确定对 NHS 具有监管影响力的组织总数;我们研究了公开的文件,列出了外部检查机构,参与了 NHS 监管合规团队的咨询会议,并审查了所有监管机构的网站。

结果

我们的映射结果显示,除了 211 个临床委托组外,还有 126 个以上的组织对 NHS 提供者组织施加了一定的监管影响。这些组织中的大多数设定了标准,并从提供者组织收集数据,相当数量的组织进行了调查。我们发现了大量重叠的功能和活动。方法的可变性和功能的重叠表明,不存在整体综合监管方法。

结论

监管可能通过对所提供的护理提供外部视角,在维持护理的安全性和质量方面提供多种好处。然而,NHS 监管系统的可变性、程度和碎片化使得监管者难以有效行动,并给 NHS 提供者组织带来了巨大的负担。重叠的监管请求可能会分散本地驱动的提高安全性和质量的举措。需要进一步研究以了解监管活动的全部范围以及所涉及的真正收益和成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验