Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 9;7(2):e011745. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011745.
The Health and Social Care Act 2012 ('HSCA 2012') introduced a new, statutory, form of regulation of competition into the National Health Service (NHS), while at the same time recognising that cooperation was necessary. NHS England's policy document, The Five Year Forward View ('5YFV') of 2014 placed less emphasis on competition without altering the legislation. We explored how commissioners and providers understand the complex regulatory framework, and how they behave in relation to competition and cooperation.
We carried out detailed case studies in four clinical commissioning groups, using interviews and documentary analysis to explore the commissioners' and providers' understanding and experience of competition and cooperation.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We conducted 42 interviews with senior managers in commissioning organisations and senior managers in NHS and independent provider organisations (acute and community services).
Neither commissioners nor providers fully understand the regulatory regime in respect of competition in the NHS, and have not found that the regulatory authorities have provided adequate guidance. Despite the HSCA 2012 promoting competition, commissioners chose mainly to use collaborative strategies to effect major service reconfigurations, which is endorsed as a suitable approach by providers. Nevertheless, commissioners are using competitive tendering in respect of more peripheral services in order to improve quality of care and value for money.
Commissioners regard the use of competition and cooperation as appropriate in the NHS currently, although collaborative strategies appear more helpful in respect of large-scale changes. However, the current regulatory framework contained in the HSCA 2012, particularly since the publication of the 5YFV, is not clear. Better guidance should be issued by the regulatory authorities.
2012 年《健康与社会保健法案》(“HSCA 2012”)在国民保健制度(NHS)中引入了一种新的、法定的竞争监管形式,同时也认识到合作是必要的。英格兰国民保健制度的政策文件,2014 年的《五年展望》(“5YFV”)对竞争的重视程度降低,但没有改变立法。我们探讨了管理者和提供者如何理解复杂的监管框架,以及他们在竞争与合作方面的行为方式。
我们在四个临床委托组中进行了详细的案例研究,使用访谈和文献分析来探讨管理者和提供者对竞争和合作的理解和经验。
地点/参与者:我们对委托组织的高级管理人员和 NHS 及独立提供者组织(急性和社区服务)的高级管理人员进行了 42 次访谈。
管理者和提供者都没有完全理解 NHS 竞争方面的监管制度,也没有发现监管机构提供了充分的指导。尽管 HSCA 2012 促进了竞争,但管理者主要选择使用合作策略来实施重大服务重组,提供者也认可这是一种合适的方法。然而,管理者正在使用竞争性招标来处理更外围的服务,以提高护理质量和物有所值。
目前,管理者认为在 NHS 中使用竞争与合作是合适的,尽管合作策略在大规模变革方面似乎更有帮助。然而,HSCA 2012 中包含的现行监管框架,特别是在 5YFV 发布之后,并不明确。监管机构应发布更好的指导。