Suppr超能文献

多中心内镜医师盲法随机临床试验比较结肠镜检查后两种肠道准备不充分的情况:研究方案。

Multicentre endoscopist-blinded randomised clinical trial to compare two bowel preparations after a colonoscopy with inadequate cleansing: a study protocol.

机构信息

Program for Experimental Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Gastroenterology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e029573. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029573.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Inadequate bowel preparation is common and negatively impacts colonoscopy quality. The objective of this study is to compare two bowel preparation regimens in cleansing the colon after an index colonoscopy with failed bowel preparation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a phase III, multicentre, randomised clinical trial comparing two bowel preparation regimens after failure to adequately cleanse at the index colonoscopy. Regimen A consists of 4 L split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS) and Regimen B consists of 6 L split-dose PEG-ELS, both preceded by 15 mg of bisacodyl the day before the procedure along with a low-fibre diet 3 and 2 days before the procedure followed by a clear fluid diet starting the day before the procedure. The primary outcome is adequate bowel preparation, defined as a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score of ≥6 with each segment score ≥2. Secondary outcomes include mean BBPS score, bowel preparation adequacy using the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer definition, detection rate by polyp subtype, caecal intubation rate, mean Validated Patient Tolerability Questionnaire for Bowel Preparation score, subject willingness to repeat the preparation and faecal incontinence rate.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study will be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines and local institutional standards. Study findings will be disseminated at an international gastroenterology conference and published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02976805; Pre-results.

摘要

介绍

肠道准备不充分很常见,会对结肠镜检查质量产生负面影响。本研究的目的是比较两种肠道准备方案在改善首次结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分后的结肠清洁效果。

方法和分析

这是一项 III 期、多中心、随机临床试验,比较了两种肠道准备方案在首次结肠镜检查肠道准备不充分后的效果。方案 A 为 4 L 分剂量聚乙二醇电解质溶液(PEG-ELS),方案 B 为 6 L 分剂量 PEG-ELS,均于检查前一天口服 15mg 比沙可啶,并在检查前 3 天和 2 天开始低纤维饮食,然后在检查前一天开始饮用清澈液体饮食。主要结局是肠道准备充分,定义为波士顿肠道准备量表(BBPS)评分≥6,每个节段评分≥2。次要结局包括平均 BBPS 评分、美国多学会工作组对结直肠癌的肠道准备充分定义、按息肉亚型计算的检出率、盲肠插管率、验证患者肠道准备耐受性问卷的平均评分、患者对再次进行肠道准备的意愿和粪便失禁率。

伦理和传播

该研究将按照良好临床实践指南和当地机构标准进行。研究结果将在国际胃肠病学会议上公布,并发表在同行评议的期刊上。

试验注册号

NCT02976805;预结果。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Validated Scales for Colon Cleansing: A Systematic Review.结肠清洁的验证量表:系统评价
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):197-204; quiz 205. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.417. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
6
Bowel preparation before colonoscopy.结肠镜检查前的肠道准备。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Apr;81(4):781-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.048. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
7
Defining and measuring quality in endoscopy.内镜检查中质量的定义与衡量
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.052. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
8
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的质量指标。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):72-90. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.385. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验