• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

gifted 或有天赋的学生与社区样本之间工作记忆的差异:一项荟萃分析。

Differences in working memory between gifted or talented students and community samples: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Universidad Europea de Canarias.

出版信息

Psicothema. 2019 Aug;31(3):255-262. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.18.

DOI:10.7334/psicothema2019.18
PMID:31292039
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gifted and talented students have different functioning in some components of executive functions, such as working memory. This meta-analysis examines the differences between students with high abilities and with average intelligence in working memory.

METHOD

A total of 17 articles with 33 different studies were analyzed. A random effects model was used, calculating the effect size with Hedges g. The moderating variables were analyzed using a meta-regression model for continuous variables and ANOVA for categorical variables.

RESULTS

Results show an average effect size of g +=0.80 (95% CI: 0.621, 0.976) and high heterogeneity (Q(32)=196.966; <.001; I =83.754%). In the studies that measured verbal working memory, the effect size was g +=0.969 (95% CI: 0.697, 1.241) and heterogeneity I =83.416%. In those assessing visual working memory, g +=0.674 (95% CI: 0.443, 0.906) and the heterogeneity was 83.416%. The analysis of the moderating variables identified the way of measuring working memory as the only significant variable.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant effect in favor of gifted and talented students in both verbal and visual working memory, with significant influence of the procedure used to measure working memory.

摘要

背景

天才学生在执行功能的某些成分(如工作记忆)方面表现出不同的功能。本元分析研究了高能力学生和普通智力学生在工作记忆方面的差异。

方法

共分析了 17 篇文章和 33 项不同的研究。采用随机效应模型,用 Hedges g 计算效应大小。使用元回归模型分析连续变量的调节变量,使用 ANOVA 分析分类变量的调节变量。

结果

结果显示平均效应大小为 g+=0.80(95%置信区间:0.621,0.976),且存在高度异质性(Q(32)=196.966;<0.001;I=83.754%)。在测量言语工作记忆的研究中,效应大小为 g+=0.969(95%置信区间:0.697,1.241),异质性 I=83.416%。在评估视觉工作记忆的研究中,g+=0.674(95%置信区间:0.443,0.906),异质性为 83.416%。对调节变量的分析发现,工作记忆的测量方式是唯一显著的变量。

结论

天才学生在言语和视觉工作记忆方面都有显著的优势,并且工作记忆的测量方式有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Differences in working memory between gifted or talented students and community samples: A meta-analysis. gifted 或有天赋的学生与社区样本之间工作记忆的差异:一项荟萃分析。
Psicothema. 2019 Aug;31(3):255-262. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.18.
2
Spatially gifted, academically inconvenienced: Spatially talented students experience less academic engagement and more behavioural issues than other talented students.具有空间天赋,学业受影响:与其他有天赋的学生相比,具有空间天赋的学生参与学术活动较少,行为问题更多。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Dec;90(4):1015-1038. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12343. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
3
Social-emotional characteristics of gifted accelerated and non-accelerated students in the Netherlands.荷兰资优加速生与非加速生的社会情感特征。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Dec;82(Pt 4):585-605. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02047.x. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
4
Students Perception of Ability Scale: comparison of scores for gifted, average, and learning disabled students.学生能力感知量表:资优、普通和学习障碍学生得分比较
Percept Mot Skills. 1986 Aug;63(1):57-8. doi: 10.2466/pms.1986.63.1.57.
5
[Metacognitive functioning in gifted children].[天才儿童的元认知功能]
Rev Neurol. 2011 Mar 1;52 Suppl 1:S11-8.
6
Mathematical skills and working memory profile of children with borderline intellectual functioning.边缘智力儿童的数学技能和工作记忆特征。
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Sep;24(3):358-366. doi: 10.1177/1744629518821251. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
7
Perceptual and academic patterns of learning-disabled/gifted students.学习障碍/天才学生的感知与学业模式。
Percept Mot Skills. 1992 Apr;74(2):599-609. doi: 10.2466/pms.1992.74.2.599.
8
Parenting gifted and talented children: what are the key child behaviour and parenting issues?养育资优儿童:关键的儿童行为和养育问题有哪些?
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;42(9):819-27. doi: 10.1080/00048670802277271.
9
Vocational interests of intellectually gifted and highly achieving young adults.高智商和高成就的年轻成年人的职业兴趣。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2013 Jun;83(Pt 2):305-28. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02063.x. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
10
Ability grouping of gifted students: effects on academic self-concept and boredom.能力分组对资优学生的影响:对学业自我概念和厌倦感的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2010 Sep;80(Pt 3):451-72. doi: 10.1348/000709909X480716. Epub 2010 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Do Intellectually Gifted Children Have Better Planning Skills?高智商儿童是否具备更好的规划能力?
J Intell. 2025 May 13;13(5):54. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13050054.
2
Two Attentional Processes Subserving Working Memory Differentiate Gifted and Mainstream Students.两种服务于工作记忆的注意过程区分了资优学生和普通学生。
J Cogn. 2024 May 23;7(1):47. doi: 10.5334/joc.370. eCollection 2024.
3
Non-Cognitive Specificities of Intellectually Gifted Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of the Literature.智力超常儿童和青少年的非认知特质:文献系统综述
J Intell. 2023 Jul 15;11(7):141. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11070141.