Cheng Li, Xie Xiaohe, Yang Shiting, Xiao Linjie, Chen Xiaoyu, Nan Yun, Qi Dong, Das Jagannath P, Georgiou George K
Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Educational and Developmental Research Center of Children's Creativity, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
J Intell. 2025 May 13;13(5):54. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13050054.
The present study aimed to examine whether intellectually gifted children had better planning skills than their chronological-age controls and what processing skills may explain these differences. A total of 35 intellectually gifted Chinese children (25 boys and 10 girls; = 12.77 years) and 39 chronological-age controls (27 boys and 12 girls; = 12.89 years) participated in this study. They were assessed on three measures of operational planning (Planned Codes, Planned Connections, and Planned Search), on a measure of action planning (Crack the Code), and on measures of processing speed, working memory, and attention. Results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed first that the two groups differed in Crack the Code (accuracy and first move time) and in Planned Connections. Whereas processing speed explained the group differences in Planned Connections, none of the processing skills were able to eliminate the group differences in Crack the Code. Taken together, these findings suggest that gifted children have better action planning, which allows them to perform better than controls in tasks that require complex problem solving and evaluation of different scenarios and solutions.
本研究旨在考察智力超常儿童是否比同年龄对照组儿童具有更好的计划能力,以及哪些加工技能可以解释这些差异。共有35名中国智力超常儿童(25名男孩和10名女孩;平均年龄 = 12.77岁)和39名年龄匹配的对照组儿童(27名男孩和12名女孩;平均年龄 = 12.89岁)参与了本研究。对他们进行了三项操作计划测量(计划编码、计划连接和计划搜索)、一项行动计划测量(破解密码)以及加工速度、工作记忆和注意力测量。方差分析(ANOVA)结果首先表明,两组在破解密码(准确性和首次移动时间)和计划连接方面存在差异。虽然加工速度解释了计划连接方面的组间差异,但没有任何加工技能能够消除破解密码方面的组间差异。综上所述,这些发现表明,超常儿童具有更好的行动计划能力,这使他们在需要复杂问题解决以及对不同情境和解决方案进行评估的任务中表现优于对照组。