Suppr超能文献

健康年轻成年人和老年人步行的代谢成本——系统评价和荟萃分析。

The Metabolic Cost of Walking in healthy young and older adults - A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Human Movement Biomechanics Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 10;9(1):9956. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45602-4.

Abstract

The Metabolic Cost of Walking (MCoW) is an important variable of daily life that has been studied extensively. Several studies suggest that MCoW is higher in Older Adults (OA) than in Young Adults (YA). However, it is difficult to compare values across studies due to differences in the way MCoW was expressed, the units in which it was reported and the walking speed at which it was measured. To provide an overview of MCoW in OA and YA and to investigate the quantitative effect of age on MCoW, we have conducted a literature review and performed two meta-analyses. We extracted data on MCoW in healthy YA (18-41 years old) and healthy OA (≥59 years old) and calculated, if not already reported, the Gross (GCoW) and Net MCoW (NCoW) in J/kg/m. If studies reported MCoW measured at multiple speeds, we selected those values for YA and OA at which MCoW was minimal. All studies directly comparing YA and OA were selected for meta-analyses. From all studies reviewed, the average GCoW in YA was 3.4 ± 0.4 J/kg/m and 3.8 ± 0.4 J/kg/m in OA (12% more in OA), and the average NCoW in YA was 2.4 ± 0.4 J/kg/m and 2.8 ± 0.5 J/kg/m in OA (17% more in OA). Our meta-analyses indicated a statistically significant elevation of both GCoW and NCoW (p < 0.001) for OA. In terms of GCoW, OA expended about 0.3 J/kg/m more metabolic energy than YA and about 0.4 J/kg/m more metabolic energy than YA in terms of NCoW. Our study showed a statistically significant elevation in MCoW of OA over YA. However, from the literature it is unclear if this elevation is directly caused by age or due to an interaction between age and methodology. We recommend further research comparing MCoW in healthy OA and YA during "natural" over-ground walking and treadmill walking, after sufficient familiarization time.

摘要

行走代谢成本(MCoW)是日常生活中的一个重要变量,已经得到了广泛的研究。有几项研究表明,老年人(OA)的 MCoW 高于年轻人(YA)。然而,由于 MCoW 的表达方式、报告单位以及测量时的行走速度不同,使得很难在研究之间进行比较。为了全面了解 OA 和 YA 中的 MCoW,并研究年龄对 MCoW 的定量影响,我们进行了文献综述并进行了两项荟萃分析。我们提取了健康 YA(18-41 岁)和健康 OA(≥59 岁)的 MCoW 数据,并计算了(如果尚未报告)以 J/kg/m 为单位的总代谢成本(GCoW)和净代谢成本(NCoW)。如果研究报告了在多个速度下测量的 MCoW,则选择 YA 和 OA 中 MCoW 最小的速度值。所有直接比较 YA 和 OA 的研究都被选为荟萃分析。从所有综述的研究中,YA 的平均 GCoW 为 3.4±0.4 J/kg/m,OA 为 3.8±0.4 J/kg/m(OA 约多 12%),YA 的平均 NCoW 为 2.4±0.4 J/kg/m,OA 为 2.8±0.5 J/kg/m(OA 约多 17%)。我们的荟萃分析表明,OA 中的 GCoW 和 NCoW 均显著升高(p<0.001)。就 GCoW 而言,OA 比 YA 多消耗约 0.3 J/kg/m 的代谢能量,而 NCoW 则多消耗约 0.4 J/kg/m 的代谢能量。我们的研究表明,OA 的 MCoW 比 YA 显著升高。然而,从文献中尚不清楚这种升高是直接由年龄引起的,还是由年龄与方法之间的相互作用引起的。我们建议进一步研究比较健康的 OA 和 YA 在“自然”地面行走和跑步机行走中的 MCoW,在经过足够的熟悉时间后进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edc1/6620279/2e4e3ea531cb/41598_2019_45602_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验