• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤模型系统数据库与国际功能、残疾和健康分类通用分类集和核心分类集在脊髓损伤方面的内容比较。

Content comparison of the Spinal Cord Injury Model System Database to the ICF Generic Sets and Core Sets for spinal cord injury.

机构信息

Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.

Department of Health Sciences and Health Policy, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2019 Dec;57(12):1023-1030. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0326-9. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1038/s41393-019-0326-9
PMID:31292520
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Mapping of the National Spinal Cord Injury Model System (SCIMS) Database (NSCID) to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

OBJECTIVES

To link the content of the latest two versions of the NSCID to the ICF; more specifically (1) to compare the content of the current NSCID 2016-2021 version to its predecessor (NSCID 2011-2016) using the ICF as a neutral reference framework, and (2) to compare the content contained in the NSCID 2016-2021 version with relevant ICF Sets.

SETTING

The forms of the NSCID 2016-2021 and 2011-2016 versions were linked to the ICF and contrasted. Comparability of the current version of the NSCID with the ICF Core Set for Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in the post-acute and long-term context and the two generic ICF sets- ICF Generic-7 and ICF Generic-30 was then examined.

METHODS

ICF Linking Rules and descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The current NSCID 2016-2021 version covers functioning as classified in the ICF with 8 ICF categories more comprehensively than its predecessor does. More than 50% of ICF categories contained in the two ICF Generic Sets were covered. The coverage of the brief ICF Core Sets for SCI by the NSCID 2016-2021 was more than 50%, but the coverage of the comprehensive core sets was low. Results showed the best coverage in the ICF component Activities and Participation.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes how the ICF and its Sets can serve as a reference framework to foster comparability of existing data sets from both clinical practice and research.

摘要

研究设计

国家脊髓损伤模型系统 (SCIMS) 数据库 (NSCID) 与国际功能、残疾和健康分类 (ICF) 的映射。

目的

将最新两个版本的 NSCID 内容与 ICF 联系起来;更具体地说,(1)使用 ICF 作为中立参考框架,比较当前的 NSCID 2016-2021 版本与其前身 (NSCID 2011-2016) 的内容,(2)比较 NSCID 2016-2021 版本中包含的内容与相关的 ICF 集。

设置

将 NSCID 2016-2021 版本的表格与 ICF 链接并进行对比。然后检查当前版本的 NSCID 在急性后和长期情况下与 ICF 脊髓损伤核心集 (SCI) 以及两个通用 ICF 集——ICF Generic-7 和 ICF Generic-30 的可比性。

方法

ICF 链接规则和描述性统计。

结果

当前的 NSCID 2016-2021 版本比其前身更全面地涵盖了 ICF 分类的功能,涵盖了 8 个 ICF 类别。两个通用 ICF 集包含的 50%以上的 ICF 类别都被涵盖。NSCID 2016-2021 涵盖了 SCI 简短 ICF 核心集的 50%以上,但全面核心集的涵盖率较低。结果表明,在 ICF 组件活动和参与方面的覆盖度最佳。

结论

本研究强调了 ICF 及其集如何作为参考框架,促进来自临床实践和研究的现有数据集的可比性。

相似文献

1
Content comparison of the Spinal Cord Injury Model System Database to the ICF Generic Sets and Core Sets for spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤模型系统数据库与国际功能、残疾和健康分类通用分类集和核心分类集在脊髓损伤方面的内容比较。
Spinal Cord. 2019 Dec;57(12):1023-1030. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0326-9. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
2
Mapping two measures to the International Classification Of Functioning, Disability and Health and the brief ICF core set for spinal cord injury in the post-acute context.将两项测量指标映射到《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》以及急性后期脊髓损伤的简短版国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组合。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Aug;38(17):1730-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1107762. Epub 2016 Jan 9.
3
Developing core sets for persons with spinal cord injuries based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》制定脊髓损伤患者的核心数据集,以此明确功能状况。
Spinal Cord. 2006 Sep;44(9):541-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101918.
4
Determining the most robust dimensional structure of categories from the international classification of functioning, disability and health across subgroups of persons with spinal cord injury to build the basis for future clinical measures.确定脊髓损伤患者亚组中《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》类别最稳定的维度结构,为未来临床测量奠定基础。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Nov;95(11):2111-2119.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
5
Rehabilitation goals of people with spinal cord injuries can be classified against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for spinal cord injuries.脊髓损伤患者的康复目标可依据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类:脊髓损伤核心集》进行分类。
Spinal Cord. 2016 Apr;54(4):324-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.155. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
6
International classification of functioning, disability and health categories for spinal cord injury nursing in China.中国脊髓损伤护理的国际功能、残疾和健康分类类目
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(1):25-32. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.890674. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
7
Category specification and measurement instruments in large spinal cord injury studies: a comparison using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health as a reference.大型脊髓损伤研究中的类别规范和测量工具:以国际功能、残疾和健康分类为参考的比较。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;90(11 Suppl 2):S39-49. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318230fc83.
8
Towards the development of clinical measures for spinal cord injury based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health with Rasch analyses.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的脊髓损伤临床评估方法的发展:Rasch 分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1685-94. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 29.
9
The comprehensive ICF core sets for spinal cord injury from the perspective of occupational therapists: a worldwide validation study using the Delphi technique.从作业治疗师的角度来看,脊髓损伤综合国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心组合:使用德尔菲技术的全球验证研究。
Spinal Cord. 2011 May;49(5):600-13. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.168. Epub 2010 Nov 30.
10
Conceptual Underpinnings of the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QoL): Comparisons of Core Sets for Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Spinal Cord Injury, and Traumatic Brain Injury.神经疾病生活质量的概念基础(Neuro-QoL):中风、多发性硬化症、脊髓损伤和外伤性脑损伤核心集的比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1763-1775. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between reticulospinal system sensitization and proprioceptive pathways in the development of dynamic spasticity (ReProDS) post-spinal cord injury: protocol for a prospective, observational cohort study.脊髓损伤后动态痉挛性发展中网状脊髓系统敏化与本体感受通路的关系(ReProDS):一项前瞻性观察队列研究方案。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Nov 13;24(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03947-y.
2
Overview of Available Functioning Data in Switzerland: Supporting the Use of Functioning as a Health Indicator Alongside Mortality and Morbidity.瑞士现有功能数据概述:支持将功能用作死亡率和发病率以外的健康指标。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Aug 14;69:1607366. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607366. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Improving quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): expert interviews using the NHS PROMs Programme and the Swedish quality registers for knee and hip arthroplasty as examples.通过患者报告结局指标(PROMs)提高医疗质量:以英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的PROMs计划以及瑞典膝关节和髋关节置换术质量登记册为例的专家访谈
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2898-z.
2
Standardized reporting of functioning information on ICF-based common metrics.基于 ICF 的通用指标的功能信息的标准化报告。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Feb;54(1):110-117. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04784-0. Epub 2017 May 23.
3
The Reliability and Validity of the Brief ICF Core Set in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
《简明国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)核心组在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中的信度和效度研究》。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jul 15;16:2077-2087. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S306410. eCollection 2021.
The International Spinal Cord Injury Survey and the Learning Health System for Spinal Cord Injury.
国际脊髓损伤调查与脊髓损伤学习健康系统
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;96(2 Suppl 1):S2-S4. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000678.
4
Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems: Review of Program and National Database From 1970 to 2015.脊髓损伤模型系统:1970年至2015年项目与国家数据库综述
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1797-804. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.027.
5
Standardization of Data for Clinical Use and Research in Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤临床应用与研究的数据标准化
Brain Sci. 2016 Aug 12;6(3):29. doi: 10.3390/brainsci6030029.
6
Harmonizing routinely collected health information for strengthening quality management in health systems: requirements and practice.协调常规收集的健康信息以加强卫生系统质量管理:要求与实践
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2016 Oct;21(4):223-8. doi: 10.1177/1355819616636411. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
7
Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information.国际功能、残疾和健康分类链接规则的细化,以加强其建立健康信息可比性的潜力。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):574-583. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1145258. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
8
Setting up a cohort study of functioning: From classification to measurement.开展一项关于功能的队列研究:从分类到测量。
J Rehabil Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):131-40. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2030.
9
Toward the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Rehabilitation Set: A Minimal Generic Set of Domains for Rehabilitation as a Health Strategy.迈向《国际功能、残疾与健康分类》(ICF)康复组合:作为一项健康战略的康复领域最小通用集。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jun;97(6):875-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.12.030. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
10
A guide on how to develop an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类核心集》编制指南
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Feb;51(1):105-17. Epub 2014 Apr 1.