Department of Nursing, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Department of Sociology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Sep;27(5):e637-e650. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12807. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
People who use alcohol and other drugs(hereafter "substances") and who are over the age of 40 are now more likely to die of a non-drug related cause than people who use substances under the age of 40. This population will therefore potentially need greater access to palliative and end of life care services. Initially, the purpose of this rapid evidence assessment (REA), conducted August 2016-August 2017, was to explore the peer-reviewed evidence base in relation to end of life care for people with problematic substance use. The following databases were searched using date parameters of 1 January 2004-1 August 2016: Amed, Psycharticles, Ovid, Ageinfo, Medline, Ebscohost, ASSIA, Social Care Online, Web of Knowledge, Web of Science, SSCI, Samsha, NIAAA. Data were extracted using a predefined protocol incorporating inclusion and exclusion criteria. Given the dearth of evidence emerging on interventions and practice responses to problematic substance use, the inclusion criteria were broadened to include any peer-reviewed literature focussing on substance use specifically and end of life care. There were 60 papers that met the inclusion criteria. These were quality assessed. Using a textual thematic approach to categorise findings, papers fell into three broad groups (a) pain management, (b) homeless and marginalised groups, and (c) alcohol-related papers. In general, this small and diverse literature lacked depth and quality. The papers suggest there are challenges for health and social care professionals in meeting the end of life needs of people who use substances. Addressing issues like safe prescribing for pain management becomes more challenging in the presence of substance use and requires flexible service provision from both alcohol/drug services and end of life care providers. Work is needed to develop models of good practice in working with co-existing substance use and end of life conditions as well as prevalence studies to provide a wider context for policy development.
现在,年龄在 40 岁以上且同时使用酒精和其他药物(以下简称“物质”)的人群,其因非药物相关原因而死亡的概率要高于年龄在 40 岁以下且使用物质的人群。因此,这部分人群可能需要更多机会获得姑息治疗和临终关怀服务。本快速证据评估(REA)最初的目的是探讨与有问题物质使用人群临终关怀相关的同行评议证据基础。2016 年 8 月至 2017 年 8 月期间,使用以下数据库进行了搜索:Amed、Psycharticles、Ovid、Ageinfo、Medline、Ebscohost、ASSIA、Social Care Online、Web of Knowledge、Web of Science、SSCI、Samsha、NIAAA。使用包含纳入和排除标准的预定义协议提取数据。鉴于干预措施和对有问题物质使用的实践应对措施方面的证据稀缺,将纳入标准放宽至纳入任何专门关注物质使用和临终关怀的同行评议文献。共有 60 篇符合纳入标准的论文。这些论文的质量进行了评估。使用文本主题方法对研究结果进行分类,论文分为三大类:(a)疼痛管理,(b)无家可归和边缘化群体,以及(c)酒精相关论文。总体而言,这一数量较少且多样化的文献缺乏深度和质量。这些论文表明,医疗和社会保健专业人员在满足物质使用者的临终关怀需求方面面临挑战。在存在物质使用的情况下,安全开具疼痛管理处方的问题变得更加具有挑战性,这需要酒精/毒品服务和临终关怀提供者提供灵活的服务提供。需要开展工作来制定在同时存在物质使用和临终条件下的良好实践模式,并进行流行性病学研究,以为政策制定提供更广泛的背景。