Schatz-Siemers Nina, Brandler Tamar C, Oweity Thaira, Sun Wei, Hernandez Andrea, Levine Pascale
Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2019 Oct;47(10):977-985. doi: 10.1002/dc.24247. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
Hürthle cell lesions often pose diagnostic challenges, despite their common occurrence on thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). The associated molecular alterations are also not well understood. Therefore, our study aimed to delineate the molecular profile of Hürthle cell lesions classified as Bethesda Categories III or IV (atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN)) on FNAC and to correlate this molecular profile with surgical resection findings.
This study consisted of 188 Hürthle cell lesions with indeterminate cytology and ThyroSeq® v2/v3 molecular testing results. Surgical follow-up was available for 33 cases.
The majority of indeterminate Hürthle cell lesions had negative ThyroSeq® results (61%) and were benign on available surgical follow-up. The most prevalent mutations involved the RAS gene (21%), which were associated with benign lesions, non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP), and malignancy. The remaining mutations involved less than 18% of the cases, including PAX8/PPARG (3.7%), TSHR (3.7%), EIF1AX (2.7%), MET (2.1%), PTEN (1.6%), clonal copy number alteration (1.6%), TERT (1.1%), and 0.5% each of GNAS, PIK3CA, and TP53 mutations. On follow-up, 45% were benign, 24% were NIFTP, and 30% were malignant. The malignant cases had different molecular alterations.
No single molecular alteration defines cytologically indeterminate Hürthle cell lesions; the majority of cases have low-risk or no molecular alterations and are benign on follow-up. These findings suggest that molecular testing may be useful, but is not definitive, in determining which cases may be managed conservatively; additional studies are needed to fully determine the negative predictive value in ruling out malignancy.
尽管甲状腺细针穿刺活检(FNAC)中嗜酸性细胞病变很常见,但它们常常带来诊断挑战。相关的分子改变也尚未完全明确。因此,我们的研究旨在描绘在FNAC中被分类为贝塞斯达III类或IV类(意义不明确的非典型病变(AUS)或可疑滤泡性肿瘤(SFN))的嗜酸性细胞病变的分子特征,并将该分子特征与手术切除结果相关联。
本研究包括188例细胞学结果不确定且有ThyroSeq® v2/v3分子检测结果的嗜酸性细胞病变。33例有手术随访结果。
大多数细胞学结果不确定的嗜酸性细胞病变ThyroSeq®检测结果为阴性(61%),且在可用的手术随访中为良性。最常见的突变涉及RAS基因(21%),其与良性病变、具有乳头状核特征的非侵袭性滤泡性甲状腺肿瘤(NIFTP)以及恶性肿瘤相关。其余突变涉及不到18%的病例,包括PAX8/PPARG(3.7%)、TSHR(3.7%)、EIF1AX(2.7%)、MET(2.1%)、PTEN(1.6%)、克隆性拷贝数改变(1.6%)、TERT(1.1%),以及GNAS、PIK3CA和TP53突变各0.5%。随访结果显示,45%为良性,24%为NIFTP,30%为恶性。恶性病例有不同的分子改变。
没有单一的分子改变能定义细胞学结果不确定的嗜酸性细胞病变;大多数病例有低风险或无分子改变,且随访中为良性。这些发现表明分子检测可能有用,但不能确定,在确定哪些病例可以保守处理时;需要更多研究来充分确定其排除恶性肿瘤的阴性预测价值。