Linsen Loes, T'Joen Veronique, Van Der Straeten Catherine, Van Landuyt Kristel, Marbaix Etienne, Bekaert Sofie, Ectors Nadine
Biobank, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bioresource Center Ghent, Health Innovation and Research Institute, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Jun 26;6:141. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00141. eCollection 2019.
From as early as 2005, different guidelines and quality standards covering biobank activities and sample handling methods have been developed to improve and guarantee the reproducibility of biomarker research. Ten years on, the BBMRI.be Quality working group wanted to gauge the current situation of these aspects in the biobanks of the BBMRI.be network. To this end, two online surveys were launched (fall 2017 and fall 2018) to the biobank quality managers in the BBMRI.be network to determine the status and setup of their current quality management system (QMS) and how their QMS and related practices have evolved over a 14 month time period. All biobanks addressed by the two surveys provided a complete response (12 and 13, respectively). A QMS was implemented in 85% of biobanks, with 4 standards emerging as primary basis. Supplementary guidelines were used, with a strong preference for the ISBER best practices for biobanks. The Standard Preanalytical Code-an indicator of the preanalytical lifecycle of a biospecimen impacting the downstream analysis results-was already implemented in 50% of the biobanks while the other half intends future implementation. To assess and maintain the quality of their QMS, 62% of biobanks used self-assessment tools and 71% participated in proficiency testing schemes. The majority of biobanks had implemented procedures for general and biobank specific activities. However, policies regarding the business and sustainability aspect of biobank were only implemented in a limited number of biobanks. A clear desire for a peer-review audit was expressed by 69% of biobanks, with over half of them intending to implement the recently published biobank standard ISO20387. Overall, the biobanks of the BBMRI.be network have actively implemented a solid quality approach in their practices. The implementation of ISO 20387 may bring further professionalization of activities. Based on the needs expressed in this survey, the Quality working group will be setting up an audit program for the BBMRI.be biobanks, to enhance, harmonize and streamline their activities. On the whole, the biobanks in the BBMRI.be network are able to substantially contribute to translational research, as a primary facilitator guaranteeing high quality standards and reproducibility.
早在2005年,就已制定了涵盖生物样本库活动和样本处理方法的不同指南和质量标准,以提高并保证生物标志物研究的可重复性。十年后,BBMRI.be质量工作组希望评估BBMRI.be网络生物样本库在这些方面的现状。为此,开展了两项在线调查(2017年秋季和2018年秋季),面向BBMRI.be网络中的生物样本库质量管理人员,以确定其当前质量管理体系(QMS)的状态和设置,以及其QMS和相关实践在14个月的时间里是如何演变的。两项调查涉及的所有生物样本库均给出了完整回复(分别为12个和13个)。85%的生物样本库实施了质量管理体系,有4项标准成为主要依据。使用了补充指南,其中对国际生物和环境样本库协会(ISBER)生物样本库最佳实践有强烈偏好。标准分析前代码(一种影响下游分析结果的生物样本分析前生命周期指标)已在50%的生物样本库中实施,另一半计划在未来实施。为评估和维持其质量管理体系的质量,62%的生物样本库使用了自我评估工具,71%参与了能力验证计划。大多数生物样本库已针对一般活动和生物样本库特定活动实施了程序。然而,关于生物样本库业务和可持续性方面政策仅在少数生物样本库中实施。69%的生物样本库明确表示希望进行同行评审审计,其中超过一半打算实施最近发布的生物样本库标准ISO20387。总体而言,BBMRI.be网络的生物样本库在实践中积极实施了坚实的质量方法。ISO 20387的实施可能会使活动进一步专业化。根据本次调查中表达的需求,质量工作组将为BBMRI.be生物样本库设立一个审计计划,以加强、协调和简化其活动。总体而言,BBMRI.be网络中的生物样本库能够作为保证高质量标准和可重复性的主要推动者,为转化研究做出重大贡献。