Suppr超能文献

在现实环境中,从其他基础胰岛素转换为甘精胰岛素300单位/毫升的2型糖尿病胰岛素治疗患者的低血糖情况及治疗模式

Hypoglycaemia and treatment patterns among insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes who switched to insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus other basal insulin in a real-world setting.

作者信息

Zhou Fang L, Nicholls Charlie, Xie Lin, Wang Yuexi, Vaidya Neel, Meneghini Luigi F

机构信息

Sanofi Bridgewater New Jersey.

Sanofi Guildford UK.

出版信息

Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2019 Jun 14;2(3):e00073. doi: 10.1002/edm2.73. eCollection 2019 Jul.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is characterized by worsening pancreatic β-cell function often requiring treatment escalation with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), glucagon-like peptide-1 and eventually insulin. Although there is much evidence available on the initiation of basal insulins, fewer studies have investigated the effects of switching from one basal insulin to another. This study aims to evaluate treatment persistence and hypoglycaemia in adult patients with T2D on prior basal insulin who were switched to insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) or other basal insulins in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort analysis of patient-level data extracted from the Optum Clinformatics database between 1 October 2014 and 30 June 2016. Adult patients (≥18 years) with T2D who were being treated with basal insulin during the 6-month baseline period, who switched to either Gla-300 or other basal insulins, were followed up for ≥3 months after switching. Outcomes included treatment persistence, and incidence and number of hypoglycaemic events.

RESULTS

Of the included patients, 1204 switched to Gla-300 and 616 switched to other basal insulins. Adjusting for baseline confounders, patients who switched to Gla-300 were 34% less likely to discontinue their basal insulin than patients who switched to other basal insulins (hazard ratio [HR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.81;  < 0.001). Patients who switched to Gla-300 were less likely to experience hypoglycaemia at 3-month follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97;  = 0.039) and at 6-month follow-up (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.87;  = 0.009) compared with patients who switched to other basal insulins.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with T2D on prior basal insulin in a real-world setting who switched to Gla-300 were more persistent with their basal insulin and experienced less hypoglycaemia than patients who switched to other basal insulins.

摘要

引言

2型糖尿病(T2D)的特征是胰腺β细胞功能逐渐恶化,常常需要增加口服降糖药(OAD)、胰高血糖素样肽-1的剂量,最终可能需要使用胰岛素。尽管关于基础胰岛素起始治疗已有大量证据,但较少有研究调查从一种基础胰岛素转换为另一种基础胰岛素的效果。本研究旨在评估在真实世界中,既往使用基础胰岛素的成年T2D患者转换为甘精胰岛素300单位/毫升(Gla-300)或其他基础胰岛素后的治疗持续性和低血糖情况。

材料与方法

本研究是一项回顾性队列分析,分析了从Optum临床信息数据库中提取的2014年10月1日至2016年6月30日期间的患者层面数据。成年(≥18岁)T2D患者在6个月的基线期接受基础胰岛素治疗,之后转换为Gla-300或其他基础胰岛素,并在转换后随访≥3个月。观察指标包括治疗持续性、低血糖事件的发生率和次数。

结果

纳入的患者中,1204例转换为Gla-300,616例转换为其他基础胰岛素。在对基线混杂因素进行调整后,转换为Gla-300的患者停用基础胰岛素的可能性比转换为其他基础胰岛素的患者低34%(风险比[HR]0.66;95%置信区间[CI]0.54-0.81;P<0.001)。与转换为其他基础胰岛素的患者相比,转换为Gla-300的患者在3个月随访时发生低血糖的可能性较小(比值比[OR]0.56,95%CI0.32-0.97;P=0.039),在6个月随访时也是如此(OR0.58,95%CI0.38-0.87;P=0.009)。

结论

在真实世界中,既往使用基础胰岛素的T2D患者转换为Gla-300后,与转换为其他基础胰岛素的患者相比,使用基础胰岛素的持续性更强,低血糖发生率更低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c6/6613231/77ad80dab92e/EDM2-2-e00073-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验