Suppr超能文献

临床常规诊断 2 型心肌梗死。一项验证研究。

Diagnosing type 2 myocardial infarction in clinical routine. A validation study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.

Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.

出版信息

Scand Cardiovasc J. 2019 Oct;53(5):259-265. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1638961. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

Abstract

Since 2010, myocardial infarction (MI) patients reported to the Swedish registry for MI (SWEDEHEART) are routinely classified into MI subtypes. The registry has been used to study the type 2 MI population but the MI-classification in the registry has not previously been validated. The aim of this study was to validate the type 2 MI classification in the registry. A total of 772 patients diagnosed with MI in 2011 and reported to the SWEDEHEART registry were included in the study. All patients were retrospectively classified into MI type 1-5 or myocardial injury by independent reviewers strictly adhering to This gold standard classification was compared with the classification in the registry. Forty-eight (6.2%) patients were classified as type 2 MI in the registry compared with 93 (12.0%) according to the gold standard classification. A type 2 MI diagnosis was confirmed in 30 out of the 48 type 2 MI patients in the registry (PPV: 62.5%). There was a moderate rate of agreement (κ: 0.43) between the gold standard classification and the classification in SWEDEHEART in deciding a type 2 MI diagnosis. The SWEDEHEART registry agreed moderately with the gold standard in classifying patients with type 2 MI diagnosis. Thus, studies on patients with type 2 MI in the registry should be interpreted with caution. Since the prevalence of type 2 MI is substantially underestimated in SWEDEHEART, the registry should not be used to study the prevalence of type 2 MI.

摘要

自 2010 年以来,向瑞典心肌梗死登记处(SWEDEHEART)报告的心肌梗死(MI)患者被常规分为 MI 亚型。该登记处已被用于研究 2 型 MI 人群,但之前尚未对登记处的 MI 分类进行验证。本研究旨在验证该登记处的 2 型 MI 分类。

共有 772 名 2011 年被诊断为 MI 并向 SWEDEHEART 登记处报告的患者被纳入本研究。所有患者均由独立审查员根据严格遵循的标准进行回顾性分类。该金标准分类与登记处的分类进行了比较。

与金标准分类相比,登记处将 48 名(6.2%)患者归类为 2 型 MI,而根据金标准分类则为 93 名(12.0%)。在登记处的 48 名 2 型 MI 患者中,有 30 名(PPV:62.5%)被确认为 2 型 MI 诊断。金标准分类和 SWEDEHEART 分类之间的诊断 2 型 MI 的一致性适中(κ:0.43)。

SWEDEHEART 登记处与金标准在诊断 2 型 MI 患者方面的分类中度一致。因此,应谨慎解读登记处关于 2 型 MI 患者的研究。由于 2 型 MI 在 SWEDEHEART 中的患病率被大大低估,因此该登记处不应用于研究 2 型 MI 的患病率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验