Suppr超能文献

对小早产儿住院护理干预措施进行分类:全球调查结果。

Categorising interventions to levels of inpatient care for small and sick newborns: Findings from a global survey.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Averting Maternal Death & Disability, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jul 11;14(7):e0218748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218748. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2017, 2.5 million newborns died, mainly from prematurity, infections, and intrapartum events. Preventing these deaths requires health systems to provide routine and emergency care at birth, and quality inpatient care for small and sick newborns. Defined levels of emergency obstetric care (EmOC) and standardised measurement of "signal functions" has improved tracking of maternal care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Levels of newborn care, particularly for small and sick newborns, and associated signal functions are still not consistently defined or tracked.

METHODS

Between November 2016-November 2017, we conducted an online survey of professionals working in maternal and newborn health. We asked respondents to categorise 18 clinical care interventions that could act as potential signal functions for small and sick newborns to 3 levels of care they thought were appropriate for health systems in LMICs to provide: "routine care at birth", "special care" and "intensive care". We calculated the percentage of respondents that classified each intervention at each level of care and stratified responses to look at variation by respondent characteristics.

RESULTS

Six interventions were classified to specific levels by more than 50% of respondents as "routine care at birth," three interventions as "special care" and one as "intensive care". Eight interventions were borderline between these care levels. Responses were more consistent for interventions with relevant WHO clinical care guidelines while more variation in respondents' classification was observed in complex interventions that lack standards or guidelines. Respondents with experience in lower-income settings were more likely to assign a higher level of care for more complex interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Results were consistent with known challenges of scaling up inpatient care in lower-income settings and underline the importance of comprehensive guidelines and standards for inpatient care. Further work is needed to develop a shortlist of newborn signal functions aligned with emergency obstetric care levels to track universal health coverage for mothers and their newborns.

摘要

背景

2017 年,有 250 万新生儿死亡,主要死于早产、感染和分娩期事件。要预防这些死亡,就需要卫生系统在分娩时提供常规和急救护理,并为小而患病的新生儿提供优质住院护理。明确的产科急救水平(EmOC)和标准化的“信号功能”测量方法提高了对中低收入国家(LMICs)产妇护理的跟踪。新生儿护理水平,特别是小而患病新生儿的护理水平,以及相关的信号功能仍然没有得到一致的定义或跟踪。

方法

在 2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 11 月期间,我们对从事母婴健康工作的专业人员进行了一项在线调查。我们要求受访者将 18 种临床护理干预措施分为 3 个层次,他们认为这些干预措施适合 LMIC 卫生系统提供:“出生时的常规护理”、“特殊护理”和“重症监护”。我们计算了将每种干预措施分类为每个护理水平的受访者百分比,并对回复进行分层,以观察按受访者特征的差异。

结果

有 6 种干预措施被超过 50%的受访者归类为“出生时的常规护理”,3 种干预措施为“特殊护理”,1 种干预措施为“重症监护”。还有 8 种干预措施处于这两个护理水平之间。对于有相关世卫组织临床护理指南的干预措施,回复更为一致,而对于缺乏标准或指南的复杂干预措施,回复则更为多样化。在收入较低的环境中具有经验的受访者更有可能为更复杂的干预措施分配更高水平的护理。

结论

结果与在低收入环境中扩大住院护理所面临的挑战一致,这突显了制定全面的住院护理指南和标准的重要性。还需要进一步努力,为跟踪母婴全民健康覆盖制定与产科急救水平相一致的新生儿信号功能清单。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26e3/6623953/ec2450735da1/pone.0218748.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验