Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre (SESRC), London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre (SESRC), London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Physiol Behav. 2019 Oct 1;209:112611. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112611. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
We investigated whether perceptually-regulated high-intensity intervals in hypoxia are associated with slower running velocities versus normoxia, when physiological responses and exercise-related sensations remain the same. Nineteen trained runners (33.4 ± 9.1 years) completed a high-intensity interval running protocol (4 × 4-min intervals at a clamped perceived rating exertion of 16 on the 6-20 Borg scale, 3-min passive recoveries) in either hypoxic (HYP; FiO 15.0%) or normoxic (NOR; FiO 20.9%) conditions. Participants adjusted to a progressively slower running velocity from interval 1-4 (-7.0%), and more so in HYP vs. NOR for intervals 2, 3 and 4 (-4.6%, -6.4% and - 7.9%, respectively; p < .01). Heart rate increased from interval 1-4 (+4.8%; p < .01), independent of condition. Arterial oxygen saturation was lower in HYP vs. NOR (86.0% vs. 94.8%; p < .01). Oxyhemoglobin (-23.7%) and total hemoglobin (-77.0%) decreased, whilst deoxyhemoglobin increased (+44.9%) from interval 1-4 (p < .01), independent of condition. Perceived recovery (-41.6%) and motivation (-21.8%) were progressively lower from interval 1-4, and more so in HYP vs. NOR for intervals 2, 3 and 4 (recovery: -8.8%, -24.2% and - 29.3%; motivation: -5.3%, -20.3% and - 22.4%, respectively; p < .01). Perceived breathlessness (+18.6%), limb discomfort (+44.0%) and pleasure (-32.2%) changed from interval 1-4, with significant differences (+21.8%, +11.3% and - 31.3%, respectively) between HYP and NOR (p < .01). Slower interval running velocities in hypoxia achieve similar heart rate and muscle oxygenation responses to those observed in normoxia when perceptually-regulated, yet at the expense of less favourable exercise-related sensations.
我们研究了在生理反应和运动相关感觉保持不变的情况下,在低氧环境中进行感知调节的高强度间歇运动是否与在常氧环境中相比,跑步速度更慢。19 名训练有素的跑步者(33.4±9.1 岁)在低氧(HYP;FiO 15.0%)或常氧(NOR;FiO 20.9%)条件下完成了高强度间歇跑步方案(4×4 分钟间隔,感觉评级为 16 的感知调节,3 分钟被动恢复期)。参与者从第一到第四间隔逐渐调整为较慢的跑步速度(-7.0%),在 HYP 中更为明显,第二、三和四间隔的跑步速度分别下降了 4.6%、6.4%和 7.9%(p<0.01)。心率从第一到第四间隔增加(+4.8%;p<0.01),与条件无关。动脉血氧饱和度在 HYP 中低于 NOR(86.0%对 94.8%;p<0.01)。氧合血红蛋白(-23.7%)和总血红蛋白(-77.0%)下降,脱氧血红蛋白(+44.9%)从第一到第四间隔增加(p<0.01),与条件无关。从第一到第四间隔,感知恢复(-41.6%)和动力(-21.8%)逐渐降低,在 HYP 中更为明显,与 NOR 相比,第二、三和四间隔的恢复分别下降了 8.8%、24.2%和 29.3%,动力分别下降了 5.3%、20.3%和 22.4%(p<0.01)。从第一到第四间隔,感知呼吸急促(+18.6%)、肢体不适(+44.0%)和愉悦度(-32.2%)发生变化,在 HYP 和 NOR 之间存在显著差异(+21.8%、+11.3%和-31.3%,分别)(p<0.01)。在感知调节下,低氧环境中较慢的间歇跑步速度可以达到与常氧环境中相同的心率和肌肉氧合反应,但运动相关感觉较差。