• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Correlation analysis between C slope and cervical sagittal parameters in short segment anterior cervical discectomy with fusion].[短节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中C角斜率与颈椎矢状位参数的相关性分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 15;33(7):877-882. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201901065.
2
[Effect of anterior cervical discectomy and decompression with different fusion segments on sagittal spine-pelvis balance].[不同融合节段的颈椎前路椎间盘切除减压术对矢状位脊柱-骨盆平衡的影响]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 15;33(3):265-272. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201807077.
3
[Analysis of imaging characteristics and effectiveness of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with cervical kyphosis].[伴颈椎后凸的脊髓型颈椎病的影像学特征及疗效分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 May 15;38(5):542-549. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402018.
4
[Correlation analysis of preoperative T slope in MRI and physiological curvature loss after expansive open-door laminoplasty].[MRI术前T角与扩大开门椎板成形术后生理曲度丢失的相关性分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jan 15;32(1):64-68. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201708116.
5
Cervical radiographic parameters in 1- and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.单节段和双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中的颈椎影像学参数。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Oct;25(4):421-429. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151056. Epub 2016 May 6.
6
The Effect of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion on Cervical Sagittal Vertical Axis and Lordosis with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术对颈椎矢状面垂直轴和前凸角的影响:至少 2 年随访结果
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;150:e727-e734. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.117. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
7
[Comparison of clinical effects of two anterior cervical decompression with fusion on treating two segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy].两种颈椎前路减压融合术治疗两节段脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2020 Sep 25;33(9):841-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.09.010.
8
[Analysis of cervical sagittal parameters on MRI in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy].[脊髓型颈椎病患者颈椎矢状位参数的MRI分析]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 15;31(4):451-454. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201610119.
9
Correlation between axial symptoms and cervical sagittal alignment parameters in patients with two-level or three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: anterior cervcial discectomy and fusion versus hybird surgery.两或三平面脊髓型颈椎病患者的轴性症状与颈椎矢状位参数的相关性:前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与Hybrid 手术。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Aug;33(8):3017-3026. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08316-4. Epub 2024 May 25.
10
Correlation between cervical spine sagittal alignment and clinical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.颈椎后纵韧带骨化症行颈椎椎板成形术后颈椎矢状位对线与临床疗效的相关性
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):100-7. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE141004. Epub 2015 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Application of Evoked Potentials in the Operation of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with Different Imaging.不同影像学在脊髓型颈椎病手术中诱发电位的临床应用
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Oct 10;2022:4154278. doi: 10.1155/2022/4154278. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
[The disputes in the radiographic measurements of sagittal balance and how to deal with them].[矢状面平衡的影像学测量中的争议及应对方法]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Nov 15;32(11):1365-1370. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201808080.
2
Multi- versus single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparing sagittal alignment, early adjacent segment degeneration, and clinical outcomes.多节段与单节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术:比较矢状位曲度、早期邻近节段退变和临床结果。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2745-2753. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5677-y. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
3
Relationship of T1 slope with loss of lordosis and surgical outcomes after laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.颈椎后纵韧带骨化症椎板成形术后T1斜率与颈椎前凸丢失及手术疗效的关系
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;164:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Can C7 Slope Substitute the T1 slope?: An Analysis Using Cervical Radiographs and Kinematic MRIs.C7 斜率能否替代 T1 斜率?:颈椎 X 线片和运动学 MRI 的分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Apr 1;43(7):520-525. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002371.
5
Cervical radiographic parameters in 1- and 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.单节段和双节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中的颈椎影像学参数。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Oct;25(4):421-429. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151056. Epub 2016 May 6.
6
Sequential alignment change of the cervical spine after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the lower cervical spine.下颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术后颈椎的序列排列变化
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2223-32. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4401-z. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
7
Influence of T1 Slope on the Cervical Sagittal Balance in Degenerative Cervical Spine: An Analysis Using Kinematic MRI.T1斜率对退变性颈椎矢状面平衡的影响:一项基于动态MRI的分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Feb;41(3):185-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001353.
8
Relationship between T1 slope and loss of lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.颈椎后纵韧带骨化症患者椎板成形术后T1斜率与颈椎前凸丢失之间的关系
Spine J. 2016 Feb;16(2):219-25. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.042. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
9
Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: an analysis of occipitocervical and spinopelvic interdependence, with C-7 slope as a marker of cervical and spinopelvic alignment.颈椎矢状位平衡:枕颈和脊柱骨盆相互依存的分析,以 C-7 斜率作为颈椎和脊柱骨盆排列的标志物。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jul;23(1):16-23. doi: 10.3171/2014.11.SPINE14368. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
10
The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery.颈椎矢状面区域站立位对线对颈椎后路融合手术疗效的影响
Neurosurgery. 2015 Mar;76 Suppl 1:S14-21; discussion S21. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000462074.66077.2b.

[短节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术中C角斜率与颈椎矢状位参数的相关性分析]

[Correlation analysis between C slope and cervical sagittal parameters in short segment anterior cervical discectomy with fusion].

作者信息

Ma Junfeng, Cheng Zhaojun, Jiang Zehua, Yuan Jianjun, Wang Wei, Long Mingxing, Zhang Xueli

机构信息

Graduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, P.R.China;Department of Spinal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, 300121, P.R.China.

Tianjin Universtity of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, 300193, P.R.China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jul 15;33(7):877-882. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201901065.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.201901065
PMID:31298007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8337420/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the relationship between preoperative C slope (C S) and sagittal parameters in anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) by imaging.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 54 patients (24 males and 30 females) with ACDF for cervical spondylosis between January 2012 and January 2017 was performed. The age ranged from 23 to 71 years (mean, 46.6 years). There were 29 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and 25 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The disease duration ranged from 3 to 48 months, with an average of 16.8 months. In the 55 patients, 44 were single-segment ACDF and 10 were double-segment ACDF. Sagittal parameters of cervical spine were measured on cervical X-ray films before operation and at last follow-up, including C Cobb angle, C sagittal vertical axis (C SVA), C S, and segment Cobb angle (SCobb), and the changes of C Cobb angle (the difference between the last follow-up and the preoperative angle) were calculated. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between the parameters before operation and at last follow-up. According to the preoperative median value of C S (15°), the patients were divided into group A (C S<15°) and group B (C S≥15°). The sagittal parameters before and after operation were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All the 54 patients were followed up 6-45 months (mean, 15.5 months). At last follow-up, C S, C Cobb angle, C SVA, and SCobb angle were significantly improved when compared with preoperative values ( <0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the preoperative C S and SCobb angles were significantly correlated with C Cobb angle and C SVA ( <0.05), but there was no significant correlation between C S and SCobb angle ( =0.049, =0.724). There was a significant correlation between C S, C Cobb angle, and SCobb angle at last follow-up ( <0.05), but there was no significant correlation between C S and SCobb angles and C SVA ( >0.05). According to the median value of preoperative C S, 28 patients in group A had C S of (11.82±3.60)°, while 26 patients in group B had C S of (20.77±4.09)°. There was no significant difference in gender and age between the two groups ( >0.05). The preoperative C Cobb angle and C SVA in group A were significantly lower than those in group B ( <0.05). There was no significant difference between preoperative SCobb angle and group B ( =0.234, =0.816). There were no significant differences in C Cobb angle, C SVA, and SCobb angle between group A and group B at last follow-up ( >0.05). However, the change of C Cobb angle in group A was significantly higher than that in group B ( =2.321, =0.024).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative C S≥15° group has more physiological lordosis before operation, but its postoperative cervical curvature changes less, while ACDF is more conducive to correct the preoperative C S<15 ° cervical curvature.

摘要

目的

通过影像学方法阐明颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)术前C角斜率(CS)与矢状面参数之间的关系。

方法

对2012年1月至2017年1月期间因颈椎病接受ACDF手术的54例患者(男24例,女30例)进行回顾性分析。年龄范围为23至71岁(平均46.6岁)。其中神经根型颈椎病29例,脊髓型颈椎病25例。病程3至48个月,平均16.8个月。55例患者中,单节段ACDF 44例,双节段ACDF 10例。术前及末次随访时在颈椎X线片上测量颈椎矢状面参数,包括Cobb角、矢状垂直轴(C SVA)、CS及节段Cobb角(SCobb),并计算Cobb角的变化(末次随访与术前角度之差)。采用Pearson相关性分析术前及末次随访时各参数之间的相关性。根据术前CS的中位数(15°)将患者分为A组(CS<15°)和B组(CS≥15°)。比较两组手术前后的矢状面参数。

结果

54例患者均获随访6至45个月(平均15.5个月)。末次随访时,CS、Cobb角、C SVA及SCobb角较术前均有显著改善(<0.05)。相关性分析显示,术前CS及SCobb角与Cobb角及C SVA显著相关(<0.05),但CS与SCobb角之间无显著相关性(=0.049,=0.724)。末次随访时CS、Cobb角及SCobb角之间存在显著相关性(<0.05),但CS与SCobb角及C SVA之间无显著相关性(>0.05)。根据术前CS中位数,A组28例患者CS为(11.82±3.60)°,B组26例患者CS为(20.77±4.09)°。两组患者性别及年龄差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。A组术前Cobb角及C SVA显著低于B组(<0.05)。术前SCobb角与B组差异无统计学意义(=0.234,=0.816)。末次随访时A组与B组Cobb角、C SVA及SCobb角差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。然而,A组Cobb角的变化显著高于B组(=2.321,=0.024)。

结论

术前CS≥15°组术前颈椎生理前凸更多,但术后颈椎曲度变化较小,而ACDF更有利于矫正术前CS<15°的颈椎曲度。