Department of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 12;9(1):10113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46099-7.
Although stress is an increasing global health problem in cities, urban green spaces can provide health benefits. There is, however, a lack of understanding of the link between physiological mechanisms and qualities of urban green spaces. Here, we compare the effects of visual stimuli (360 degree virtual photos of an urban environment, forest, and park) to the effects of congruent olfactory stimuli (nature and city odours) and auditory stimuli (bird songs and noise) on physiological stress recovery. Participants (N = 154) were pseudo-randomised into participating in one of the three environments and subsequently exposed to stress (operationalised by skin conductance levels). The park and forest, but not the urban area, provided significant stress reduction. High pleasantness ratings of the environment were linked to low physiological stress responses for olfactory and to some extent for auditory, but not for visual stimuli. This result indicates that olfactory stimuli may be better at facilitating stress reduction than visual stimuli. Currently, urban planners prioritise visual stimuli when planning open green spaces, but urban planners should also consider multisensory qualities.
尽管压力是城市中日益严重的全球健康问题,但城市绿地可以带来健康益处。然而,人们对于生理机制与城市绿地质量之间的联系还缺乏了解。在这里,我们比较了视觉刺激(城市环境、森林和公园的 360 度虚拟照片)、嗅觉刺激(自然和城市气味)和听觉刺激(鸟鸣和噪音)对生理应激恢复的影响。参与者(N=154)被随机分为三组,分别参与其中一种环境,随后暴露于应激(通过皮肤电导率水平来操作)下。公园和森林,而不是城市地区,能显著减轻压力。对环境的高愉悦度评价与嗅觉的低生理应激反应相关,在一定程度上也与听觉相关,但与视觉刺激无关。这一结果表明,嗅觉刺激可能比视觉刺激更能促进压力缓解。目前,城市规划者在规划开放绿地时优先考虑视觉刺激,但城市规划者也应该考虑多感官质量。