School of Biological Sciences and the Environment Institute, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, South Australia, Australia.
School of Natural Sciences, Australian Research Council Training Centre for Forest Value, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Oct;20(10):615-628. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0152-0. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
Billions of hectares of natural ecosystems have been degraded through human actions. The global community has agreed on targets to halt and reverse these declines, and the restoration sector faces the important but arduous task of implementing programmes to meet these objectives. Existing and emerging genomics tools offer the potential to improve the odds of achieving these targets. These tools include population genomics that can improve seed sourcing, meta-omics that can improve assessment and monitoring of restoration outcomes, and genome editing that can generate novel genotypes for restoring challenging environments. We identify barriers to adopting these tools in a restoration context and emphasize that regulatory and ethical frameworks are required to guide their use.
数十亿公顷的自然生态系统已经因为人类活动而退化。国际社会已经就停止和扭转这些退化的目标达成一致,而恢复部门面临着实施计划以实现这些目标的重要但艰巨的任务。现有的和新兴的基因组学工具提供了提高实现这些目标的机会。这些工具包括可以改善种子来源的群体基因组学、可以改善恢复结果评估和监测的元组学,以及可以为恢复具有挑战性的环境生成新型基因型的基因组编辑。我们确定了在恢复背景下采用这些工具的障碍,并强调需要监管和道德框架来指导它们的使用。