Suppr超能文献

害怕时去哪里觅食:感知风险会影响对食物景观的利用吗?

Where to forage when afraid: Does perceived risk impair use of the foodscape?

机构信息

Haub School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, 804 East Fremont Street, Laramie, Wyoming, 82072, USA.

Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Dept. 3166, 1000 East University Avenue, Laramie, Wyoming, 82071, USA.

出版信息

Ecol Appl. 2019 Oct;29(7):e01972. doi: 10.1002/eap.1972. Epub 2019 Jul 30.

Abstract

The availability and quality of forage on the landscape constitute the foodscape within which animals make behavioral decisions to acquire food. Novel changes to the foodscape, such as human disturbance, can alter behavioral decisions that favor avoidance of perceived risk over food acquisition. Although behavioral changes and population declines often coincide with the introduction of human disturbance, the link(s) between behavior and population trajectory are difficult to elucidate. To identify a pathway by which human disturbance may affect ungulate populations, we tested the Behaviorally Mediated Forage-Loss Hypothesis, wherein behavioral avoidance is predicted to reduce use of available forage adjacent to disturbance. We used GPS collar data collected from migratory mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) to evaluate habitat selection, movement patterns, and time-budgeting behavior in response to varying levels of forage availability and human disturbance in three different populations exposed to a gradient of energy development. Subsequently, we linked animal behavior with measured use of forage relative to human disturbance, forage availability, and quality. Mule deer avoided human disturbance at both home range and winter range scales, but showed negligible differences in vigilance rates at the site level. Use of the primary winter forage, sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata), increased as production of new annual growth increased but use decreased with proximity to disturbance. Consequently, avoidance of human disturbance prompted loss of otherwise available forage, resulting in indirect habitat loss that was 4.6-times greater than direct habitat loss from roads, well pads, and other infrastructure. The multiplicative effects of indirect habitat loss, as mediated by behavior, impaired use of the foodscape by reducing the amount of available forage for mule deer, a consequence of which may be winter ranges that support fewer animals than they did before development.

摘要

景观中草料的可获得性和质量构成了动物获取食物的食物景观。食物景观的新颖变化,如人为干扰,可以改变动物的行为决策,使其更倾向于避免感知到的风险,而不是获取食物。尽管行为变化和种群数量下降通常与人为干扰的引入同时发生,但行为和种群轨迹之间的联系很难阐明。为了确定人为干扰可能影响有蹄类动物种群的途径,我们检验了行为介导的草料损失假说,即行为回避预计会减少对干扰附近可用草料的利用。我们使用从迁徙的骡鹿(Odocoileus hemionus)收集的 GPS 项圈数据,评估了在三种不同种群中,对不同水平的草料可获得性和人为干扰的响应,以评估栖息地选择、运动模式和时间分配行为。随后,我们将动物行为与相对于人为干扰、草料可获得性和质量的草料实际利用情况联系起来。骡鹿在其栖息地和冬季栖息地范围内都回避人为干扰,但在现场水平上的警戒率差异微不足道。主要冬季草料 sagebrush(Artemisia tridentata)的利用量随着新的年度生长物产量的增加而增加,但随着与干扰的接近而减少。因此,对人为干扰的回避导致了本可利用的草料的损失,从而导致间接的栖息地损失,其间接损失是道路、井场和其他基础设施造成的直接栖息地损失的 4.6 倍。行为介导的间接栖息地损失的倍增效应,通过减少骡鹿可用草料的数量,损害了食物景观的利用,其结果可能是冬季栖息地所能容纳的动物数量比开发前少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6896/6852243/b3749fbfda36/EAP-29-na-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验