Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND

Considering the limitations of conventional western treatment for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and the extensive exploration of Chinese herbal injections (CHIs), systematically and critically evaluating the efficacy of CHIs in the treatment of CAP is necessary.

PURPOSE

This study constructed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to investigate the efficacy of CHIs (including the Reduning injection (RDN), Yanhuning injection (YHN), Xiyanping injection (XYP), and Tanreqing injection (TRQ)) combined with Western medicine (WM) and WM alone in CAP.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted in several databases from inception to June 2018. The quality of the included studies was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool and modified Jadad scale. Data were analyzed by STATA 13.0 and WinBUGS 14.0 software. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability values were applied to rank the examined treatments. Clustering analysis was utilized to compare the effect of CHIs between two different outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 47 eligible randomized controlled trials involving 4713 patients and 4 CHIs were included. The results of the NMA showed that RDN, YHN, XYP and TRQ combined with WM significantly improved treatment performance compared to WM alone. YHN+WM had obvious superiorities in the clinical effective rate, time for the disappearance of cough and the level of C-reactive protein. TRQ+WM was the most advantageous in shortening the time for defervescence and the average hospitalization time. XYP+WM was shown to reduce the time for the disappearance of lung rales best. Sixteen articles reported adverse drug reactions/adverse drug events (ADRs/ADEs) in detail, and 17 articles reported that there were no obvious ADRs/ADEs.

CONCLUSION

This NMA showed that using CHIs in combination with WM improved treatment performance and could be beneficial for patients with CAP compared to using WM alone. Thereinto, YHN+WM showed a preferable improvement on patients with CAP when unified considering the clinical effective rate and other outcomes. As for safety, more evidence is needed to support this hypothesis.