Suppr超能文献

评估头颈部病变的超声和细针抽吸。

Evaluation of ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration in the assessment of head and neck lesions.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kantonsspital Baselland, Rheinstrasse 26, 4410, Liestal, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;276(10):2903-2911. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05552-z. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Neck masses of uncertain character need further investigation through imaging and tissue sampling. This is the most extensive study in the literature of clinician-operated ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration (US + FNA) of the head and neck with histological verification, itemized into organ system. The purpose of the present study was to comprehensively evaluate the combination of US + FNA in the assessment of various kinds of head and neck lesions in the hand of the clinician in one single study.

METHODS

A total of 408 histologically verified head and neck lesions in 376 consecutive patients undergoing all three diagnostic steps (US, FNA, US + FNA) were included. Excisional biopsy or core-needle biopsy served as a gold standard. US and FNA were evaluated alone and in combination to distinguish between malignant and benign lesions as well as to establish an approximate and specific diagnosis. Each calculation was itemized by organ system.

RESULTS

In detecting malignancy, US + FNA showed a significantly higher accuracy (97% vs 86% and 92%) than US and FNA alone. An approximate diagnosis was established in 93%, and a specific diagnosis in 88%, which was significantly better than that of US and FNA alone.

CONCLUSION

US + FNA is suited for an efficient evaluation of head and neck masses. This combined method should be the first line of investigation in such lesions before any other imaging and/or sampling methods. While discrepancies in diagnostic findings potentially occur, the key is the interpretation of the package (US and cytologic findings, clinical information) made in one consultation by one clinician to proceed in proper decision making regarding an adequate treatment plan. Consequently US + FNA belong to the standard armamentarium of the otolaryngologist.

摘要

目的

性质不明的颈部肿块需要通过影像学和组织取样进一步检查。这是文献中对临床医生操作的超声和头颈部细针抽吸(US+FNA)进行的最广泛研究,按器官系统进行了分项。本研究的目的是综合评估 US+FNA 在单一研究中对手头各种头颈部病变的评估。

方法

共纳入 376 例连续患者的 408 例经组织学证实的头颈部病变,所有患者均接受了全部三个诊断步骤(US、FNA、US+FNA)。切除活检或核心针活检作为金标准。单独和联合评估 US 和 FNA 以区分良恶性病变,并建立大致和明确的诊断。每个计算都按器官系统分项。

结果

在检测恶性肿瘤方面,US+FNA 的准确性明显高于 US 和 FNA 单独检查(97%比 86%和 92%)。建立了大致诊断(93%)和明确诊断(88%),明显优于 US 和 FNA 单独检查。

结论

US+FNA 适合对头颈部肿块进行有效评估。在使用任何其他成像和/或取样方法之前,这种联合方法应该是此类病变的首选检查方法。虽然诊断结果存在差异,但关键是由一位临床医生在一次咨询中对套餐(US 和细胞学结果、临床信息)进行解释,以正确决策制定适当的治疗计划。因此,US+FNA 属于耳鼻喉科医生的标准武器库。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验