Department of Psychology, University of East London, Water Lane, London E15 4LZ, UK.
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, 16 De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Curr Biol. 2019 Jul 22;29(14):2415-2422.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
When we see someone experiencing an emotion, and when we experience it ourselves, common neurophysiological activity occurs [1, 2]. But although inter-dyadic synchrony, concurrent and sequential [3], has been identified, its functional significance remains inadequately understood. Specifically, how do influences of partner A on partner B reciprocally influence partner A? For example, if I am experiencing an affective state and someone matches their physiological state to mine, what influence does this have on me-the person experiencing the emotion? Here, we investigated this using infant-parent dyads. We developed miniaturized microphones to record spontaneous vocalizations and wireless autonomic monitors to record heart rate, heart rate variability, and movement in infants and parents concurrently in naturalistic settings. Overall, we found that infant-parent autonomic activity did not covary across the day-but that "high points" of infant arousal led to autonomic changes in the parent and that instances where the adult showed greater autonomic responsivity were associated with faster infant quieting. Parental responsivity was higher following peaks in infant negative affect than in positive affect. Overall, parents responded to increases in their child's arousal by increasing their own. However, when the overall arousal level of the dyad was high, parents responded to elevated child arousal by decreasing their own arousal. Our findings suggest that autonomic state matching has a direct effect on the person experiencing the affective state and that parental co-regulation may involve both connecting and disconnecting their own arousal state from that of the child contingent on context.
当我们看到某人正在经历某种情绪,或者当我们自己经历某种情绪时,通常会出现共同的神经生理活动[1,2]。然而,尽管已经确定了人际间的同步性,包括同时和顺序的同步[3],但其功能意义仍未得到充分理解。具体来说,一方对另一方的影响如何反过来又影响到一方?例如,如果我正在经历某种情感状态,而有人与我的生理状态相匹配,这对我——那个正在经历情感的人会有什么影响?在这里,我们使用婴儿-父母对子来研究这个问题。我们开发了微型麦克风来记录自发的发声,以及无线自主监测器来同时记录婴儿和父母的心率、心率变异性和运动,在自然环境中进行。总的来说,我们发现婴儿-父母的自主活动并没有在一天中相互变化——但是婴儿的觉醒“高峰”会导致父母的自主变化,而成年人表现出更高的自主反应能力与婴儿更快地安静下来有关。与积极情绪相比,父母在婴儿出现负面情绪时的反应更为强烈。总的来说,父母会通过增加自己的反应来回应孩子的觉醒增加。然而,当对子的整体觉醒水平较高时,父母会通过降低自己的觉醒来回应孩子的升高的觉醒。我们的发现表明,自主状态匹配对经历情感状态的人有直接影响,而父母的共同调节可能涉及根据情境将自己的唤醒状态与孩子的唤醒状态连接和断开。