全身麻醉下全腹子宫切除术后的恢复质量与镇痛效果:腹横肌平面阻滞与硬膜外镇痛及非肠道用药的随机对照试验
Quality of recovery and analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial of TAP block vs epidural analgesia vs parenteral medications.
作者信息
Mathew Preethy, Aggarwal Neelam, Kumari Kamlesh, Gupta Aakriti, Panda Nidhi, Bagga Rashmi
机构信息
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anaesthesia, Dr. B.L. Kapur Memorial Hospital, New Delhi, India.
出版信息
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Apr-Jun;35(2):170-175. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_206_18.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Parenteral analgesics and epidural analgesia are two standard options to treat postoperative pain after total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Fascial plane blocks such as transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block have gained popularity recently. However, effect of these analgesic regimens on quality of postoperative recovery (QoR) has not been studied. Hence we aimed to assess and compare the QoR with three different postoperative analgesic regimens---parenteral analgesia, epidural analgesia, and TAP block in patients undergoing TAH under general anesthesia.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Sixty female patients undergoing TAH were randomized into three groups of 20 each for postoperative analgesia. Epidural group received boluses of 0.125% bupivacaine for 24 h, parenteral group received injection diclofenac and injection tramadol alternately every 6 h for 24 h, and TAP group received bilateral TAP block with 0.25% bupivacaine at end of operation. QoR was assessed postoperatively by 40-item questionnaire-QOR-40 and pain was assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS).
RESULTS
QOR-40 score was comparable across the three groups at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. TAP block prolonged the time to first rescue analgesic ( = 0.02) and reduced the total 24-h postoperative morphine consumption by 2.4 (95% CI: 1.0, 3.8) mg ( = 0.002) and 7.8 (95% CI: 6.4, 9.1) mg ( < 0.001) when compared with epidural and parenteral groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The QoR after abdominal hysterectomy is similar with either intravenous analgesics or epidural analgesia or TAP block when used with rescue analgesia to manage postoperative pain. TAP block provides superior analgesia and reduces 24-h morphine consumption when compared with parenteral and epidural analgesia.
背景与目的
胃肠外镇痛药和硬膜外镇痛是全腹子宫切除术后(TAH)治疗术后疼痛的两种标准选择。诸如腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞等筋膜平面阻滞近来颇受关注。然而,这些镇痛方案对术后恢复质量(QoR)的影响尚未得到研究。因此,我们旨在评估并比较全身麻醉下接受TAH手术患者采用三种不同术后镇痛方案——胃肠外镇痛、硬膜外镇痛和TAP阻滞——后的QoR。
材料与方法
60例接受TAH手术的女性患者被随机分为三组,每组20例,接受术后镇痛。硬膜外组接受0.125%布比卡因推注,持续24小时;胃肠外组每6小时交替接受双氯芬酸注射液和曲马多注射液,持续24小时;TAP组在手术结束时接受双侧0.25%布比卡因TAP阻滞。术后通过40项问卷-QOR-40评估QoR,通过数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛。
结果
术后24、48和72小时,三组的QOR-40评分相当。与硬膜外组和胃肠外组相比,TAP阻滞延长了首次补救镇痛时间(P = 0.02),并使术后24小时吗啡总消耗量分别减少2.4(95%CI:1.0,3.8)mg(P = 0.002)和7.8(95%CI:6.4,9.1)mg(P < 0.001)。
结论
当使用补救镇痛来处理术后疼痛时,子宫切除术后采用静脉镇痛、硬膜外镇痛或TAP阻滞的QoR相似。与胃肠外镇痛和硬膜外镇痛相比,TAP阻滞提供了更好的镇痛效果,并减少了24小时吗啡消耗量。