Fernández Natalia Jorgelina, Damiani Natalia, Podaza Enrique Arturo, Martucci Josefa Fabiana, Fasce Diana, Quiroz Federico, Meretta Pablo Ezequiel, Quintana Silvina, Eguaras Martín Javier, Gende Liesel Brenda
Centro de Investigación en Abejas Sociales (CIAS), Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción Sanidad y Ambiente (IIPROSAM), Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la provincia de Buenos Aires (CIC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350 (7600) Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Rivadavia 1917, C1033AJ Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2019 Jul;26(5):906-912. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 9.
The aim of this work was to compare the antimicrobial activity against and the antioxidant capacity of two L. extracts obtained by different extraction methods. The hydroalcoholic extract was moreover added as supplementary diet to bees in field conditions to test behavioural effects and colony strength. Both laurel extracts were subjected to different phytochemical analysis to identify their bioactive compounds. Antimicrobial activity was analyzed by the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination by means the agar dilution method. The hydroalcoholic extract (HE) was able to inhibit the bacterial growth of all strains, with 580 µg/mL mean value. This better antibacterial activity in relation to the essential oil (EO) could be explained by the presence of some phenolic compounds, such as flavonoids, evidenced by characteristic bands resulting from the Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis. Antioxidant activities of the extracts were evaluated by 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical-scavenging ability and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays. The HE showed the highest antioxidant activity as measured by DPPH, with IC50 values of 257 ± 12 μg/mL. The FRAP assay method showed that the HE was 3-fold more effective reducing agent than the EO. When the bee colonies were supplied with laurel HE in sugar paste an improvement in their general condition was noticed, although neither the hygienic behavior nor the proportions of the breeding cells varied statistically due to the treatment. In conclusion, the inhibition power against attributable to the phenolic compounds, the antioxidant capacity of the HE, and the non-lethal effects on adult honey bees on field trials suggest the HE of laurel as a promising substance for control American foulbrood disease.
这项工作的目的是比较通过不同提取方法获得的两种月桂提取物的抗菌活性和抗氧化能力。此外,在田间条件下,将水醇提取物作为补充饲料添加到蜜蜂中,以测试其行为影响和蜂群强度。对两种月桂提取物都进行了不同的植物化学分析,以鉴定其生物活性化合物。通过琼脂稀释法测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC)来分析抗菌活性。水醇提取物(HE)能够抑制所有菌株的细菌生长,平均值为580μg/mL。相对于精油(EO)而言,这种更好的抗菌活性可以通过某些酚类化合物(如黄酮类化合物)的存在来解释,傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)分析产生的特征谱带证明了这一点。通过2,2-二苯基-1-苦基肼(DPPH)自由基清除能力和铁还原抗氧化能力(FRAP)测定来评估提取物的抗氧化活性。以DPPH测定,HE显示出最高的抗氧化活性,IC50值为257±12μg/mL。FRAP测定方法表明,HE作为还原剂的效果是EO的3倍。当在糖糊中向蜂群提供月桂HE时,注意到它们的总体状况有所改善,尽管由于处理,卫生行为和繁殖细胞的比例在统计学上均未发生变化。总之,酚类化合物对[具体细菌名称未给出]的抑制能力、HE的抗氧化能力以及在田间试验中对成年蜜蜂的非致死效应表明,月桂HE是控制美洲幼虫腐臭病的一种有前景的物质。