Primary Care Department, School of Medicine, Université Paris-Est Créteil (UPEC), Créteil, France.
Maison de Santé Pluri-professionnelle de Sucy-en-Brie, Sucy-en-Brie, France.
Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 19;37(1):15-24. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz031.
No study has investigated factors associated with non-participation or partial participation in the different combination patterns of screening programmes for all three cancers, that is, breast, colorectal and cervical cancer.
In a retrospective cohort study, we sought to describe combinations of cancer screening participation rates among women in the Val-de-Marne area of France and to identify individual and contextual factors associated with non-participation or partial participation.
Women aged between 50 and 65 and who were eligible for all three screening programmes (n = 102 219) were analysed in multilevel logistic models, with the individual as the Level 1 variable and the place of residence as the Level 2 variable. The women who did not participate in any of the screening programmes were 34.4%, whereas 30.1%, 24% and 11.5% participated in one, two or all three screening programmes, respectively. Age below 55, a previous false-positive mammography, prior opportunistic mammography only, no previous mammography, membership of certain health insurance schemes (all P < 0.05) and residence in a deprived area (P < 0.001) were independently associated with non-participation or partial participation. We observed a stronger effect of deprivation on non-participation in all three cancers than in combinations of screening programmes.
Our findings suggest that the health authorities should focus on improving cancer screenings in general rather than screenings for specific types of cancer, especially among younger women and those living in the most socially deprived areas.
目前尚无研究调查与三种癌症(乳腺癌、结直肠癌和宫颈癌)不同筛查方案的组合模式的非参与或部分参与相关的因素。
在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们旨在描述法国瓦尔省(Val-de-Marne)地区女性癌症筛查参与率的组合,并确定与非参与或部分参与相关的个体和背景因素。
我们对年龄在 50 至 65 岁之间且有资格参加所有三种筛查方案的女性(n=102219)进行了多层次逻辑模型分析,将个体作为一级变量,将居住地作为二级变量。未参加任何筛查方案的女性占 34.4%,而分别有 30.1%、24%和 11.5%的女性参加了一项、两项或三项筛查方案。年龄低于 55 岁、先前有假阳性乳腺 X 线摄影史、仅进行过机会性乳腺 X 线摄影、无先前乳腺 X 线摄影史、参加某些健康保险计划(均 P<0.05)和居住在贫困地区(P<0.001)与非参与或部分参与相关。我们观察到,贫困对三种癌症的非参与的影响比筛查方案组合的影响更强。
我们的研究结果表明,卫生当局应重点提高一般癌症筛查的水平,而不是针对特定类型的癌症进行筛查,特别是在年轻女性和居住在最贫困地区的人群中。