• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体水平上的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和肠癌筛查的参与率比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.

Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2019 Oct;121(8):710-714. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0564-9. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1038/s41416-019-0564-9
PMID:31481732
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6889480/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We investigated demographic and clinical predictors of lower participation in bowel screening relative to breast and cervical screening.

METHODS

Data linkage study of routinely collected clinical data from 430,591 women registered with general practices in the Greater Glasgow & Clyde Health Board. Participation in the screening programmes was measured by attendance at breast or cervical screening or the return of a bowel screening kit.

RESULTS

72.6% of 159,993 women invited attended breast screening, 80.7% of 309,899 women invited attended cervical screening and 61.7% of 180,408 women invited completed bowel screening. Of the 68,324 women invited to participate in all three screening programmes during the study period, 52.1% participated in all three while 7.2% participated in none. Women who participated in breast (OR = 3.34 (3.21, 3.47), p < 0.001) or cervical (OR = 3.48 (3.32, 3.65), p < 0.001) were more likely to participate in bowel screening.

CONCLUSION

Participation in bowel screening was lower than breast or cervical for this population although the same demographic factors were associated with uptake, namely lower social deprivation, increasing age, low levels of comorbidity and prior non-malignant neoplasms. As women who complete breast and cervical are more likely to also complete bowel screening, interventions at these procedures to encourage bowel screening participation should be explored.

摘要

背景

我们调查了相对于乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查,参与结直肠筛查率较低的人口统计学和临床预测因素。

方法

对大格拉斯哥和克莱德卫生委员会注册的 430591 名女性常规收集的临床数据进行数据链接研究。通过参加乳腺癌或宫颈癌筛查或返回结直肠筛查包来衡量筛查计划的参与情况。

结果

在 159993 名受邀女性中,72.6%参加了乳腺癌筛查,在 309899 名受邀女性中,80.7%参加了宫颈癌筛查,在 180408 名受邀女性中,61.7%完成了结直肠筛查。在研究期间,有 68324 名女性受邀参加所有三项筛查计划,其中 52.1%的女性参加了所有三项,而 7.2%的女性一项都没有参加。参加乳腺癌(OR=3.34(3.21,3.47),p<0.001)或宫颈癌(OR=3.48(3.32,3.65),p<0.001)的女性更有可能参加结直肠筛查。

结论

尽管参与率与乳腺癌和宫颈癌相同的人口统计学因素(即较低的社会剥夺、年龄增长、低合并症水平和既往非恶性肿瘤)相关,但该人群参与结直肠筛查的比例低于乳腺癌或宫颈癌。由于完成乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的女性更有可能完成结直肠筛查,因此应探索在这些程序中采取干预措施来鼓励参与结直肠筛查。

相似文献

1
Comparing uptake across breast, cervical and bowel screening at an individual level: a retrospective cohort study.个体水平上的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和肠癌筛查的参与率比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Oct;121(8):710-714. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0564-9. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
2
Concurrent participation in screening for cervical, breast, and bowel cancer in England.英格兰同时参与宫颈癌、乳腺癌和肠癌筛查。
J Med Screen. 2020 Mar;27(1):9-17. doi: 10.1177/0969141319871977. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
3
Why colorectal screening fails to achieve the uptake rates of breast and cervical cancer screening: a comparative qualitative study.为什么结直肠癌筛查未能达到乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的参与率:一项比较定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jun;29(6):482-490. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009998. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
4
Predictive factors for non-participation or partial participation in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programmes†.**预测因素**:**乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查**项目中**不参与或部分参与**的。 **注**:† 为原文脚注。
Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 19;37(1):15-24. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmz031.
5
Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Adherence: Effect of Low Body Mass Index in Women.乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的依从性:女性低体重指数的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jul;29(7):996-1006. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7739. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
6
Concurrent participation in breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening in the Netherlands.荷兰的乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的同步参与情况。
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Nov;175:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.08.018. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
7
Association of Neighborhood Measures of Social Determinants of Health With Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US Midwest.美国中西部社区健康社会决定因素指标与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200618. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0618.
8
Comparing barriers to colorectal cancer screening with barriers to breast and cervical screening: a population-based survey of screening-age women in Great Britain.比较结直肠癌筛查障碍与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查障碍:英国筛查年龄女性的基于人群调查。
J Med Screen. 2013 Jun;20(2):73-9. doi: 10.1177/0969141313492508. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
9
Social capital and adherence to cervical and breast cancer screening guidelines: a cross-sectional study in rural Crete.社会资本与宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查指南的依从性:克里特岛农村地区的一项横断面研究
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jul;22(4):395-404. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12096. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
10
Screening attendance of breast or cervical cancers and its associated factors among 30-49 year old women in Gedeo zone, South Ethiopia: Cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚南部盖德奥地区30 - 49岁女性乳腺癌或宫颈癌筛查参与情况及其相关因素:横断面研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0315891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315891. eCollection 2025.

引用本文的文献

1
Public and Healthcare Professional Attitudes Towards Risk-Stratified Bowel Screening: A Qualitative Study Using an Info-Comic Book.公众和医疗保健专业人员对风险分层肠道筛查的态度:一项使用信息漫画书的定性研究
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70315. doi: 10.1111/hex.70315.
2
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of liver cancer screening among high-risk populations in China.中国高危人群肝癌筛查的知识、态度和行为
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):2346. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23582-7.
3
Interventions to increase uptake in a fecal-immunochemical test population-based colorectal cancer screening program: A quasi-experimental study of first-time invitees.在基于粪便免疫化学检测的人群结直肠癌筛查项目中提高参与率的干预措施:一项针对首次受邀者的准实验研究
Cancer. 2025 Apr 1;131(7):e35760. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35760.
4
Identifying the deficits in cancer care for people with intellectual disabilities.识别智障人士癌症护理方面的不足。
BMJ Oncol. 2024 Feb 13;3(1):e000171. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000171. eCollection 2024.
5
Population-based cancer incidence and mortality rates and ratios among adults with intellectual disabilities in Scotland: a retrospective cohort study with record linkage.基于人群的癌症发病率和死亡率以及苏格兰成年智障人群中的比例:一项基于记录链接的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 14;14(8):e084421. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084421.
6
The association of demographic and socioeconomic variables with cancer screening participation: A national cross-sectional study of three cancer screening programs in Denmark.人口统计学和社会经济变量与癌症筛查参与情况的关联:丹麦三项癌症筛查项目的全国性横断面研究。
Heliyon. 2024 May 13;10(13):e31163. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31163. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
7
Exploring Gender Disparities in Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening Compliance in Singapore.探讨影响新加坡结直肠癌筛查遵从性的因素中的性别差异。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Mar 1;25(3):867-873. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.3.867.
8
Primary care practice-based interventions and their effect on participation in population-based cancer screening programs: a systematic narrative review.基于初级保健实践的干预及其对参与基于人群的癌症筛查计划的影响:系统叙述性综述。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Feb 12;25:e12. doi: 10.1017/S1463423623000713.
9
How is equity captured for colorectal, breast and cervical cancer incidence and screening in the Republic of Ireland: A review.爱尔兰共和国在结直肠癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌发病率及筛查方面的公平性情况综述
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Sep 17;36:102405. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102405. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Association Between Depression and Anxiety Status With Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among US Adults: A Population-Level Study.美国成年人抑郁症和焦虑症状态与结直肠癌筛查接受情况之间的关联:一项人群水平研究
Cureus. 2023 Jul 29;15(7):e42659. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42659. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Data Resource Profile: The Scottish National Prescribing Information System (PIS).数据资源简介:苏格兰国家处方信息系统(PIS)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;45(3):714-715f. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw060. Epub 2016 May 10.
2
Socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical screening coverage in England: are we closing the gap?英格兰乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查覆盖率中的社会经济不平等:我们正在缩小差距吗?
J Med Screen. 2016 Jun;23(2):98-103. doi: 10.1177/0969141315600192. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
3
Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: a general population survey.英国民众对癌症筛查的热情:一项普通人群调查。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Feb 3;112(3):562-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.643. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
4
Comparing barriers to colorectal cancer screening with barriers to breast and cervical screening: a population-based survey of screening-age women in Great Britain.比较结直肠癌筛查障碍与乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查障碍:英国筛查年龄女性的基于人群调查。
J Med Screen. 2013 Jun;20(2):73-9. doi: 10.1177/0969141313492508. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
5
Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England.参与有组织的全国结直肠癌筛查计划的不平等:来自英格兰前 260 万份邀请的结果。
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;40(3):712-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr008. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
6
Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data.英国乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查报告使用情况的不平等:横断面调查数据分析
BMJ. 2009 Jun 16;338:b2025. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2025.
7
New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality.新版国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)的查尔森合并症指数可预测住院死亡率。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Dec;57(12):1288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.03.012.
8
Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.美国对癌症筛查的热情。
JAMA. 2004 Jan 7;291(1):71-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.1.71.