Normandie univ, UNICAEN, Inserm U1086, ANTICIPE, Caen, 14000, France.
Cancer et expositions environnementales, Univ. Bordeaux, Inserm U1219, EPICENE, Bordeaux, 33000, France.
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Apr 21;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02311-5.
This article looks at the behaviour of women facing different cancer screening options available to them from the age of 50 onward. The study was conducted in 2019 in four departments of the French territory with the objective of identifying the factors that influence acceptance of a population-based screening proposal.
A questionnaire was sent to women who had received three invitations to organised screenings (OS) for both breast and colorectal cancer. The categories of participants in both OS were designed from data from the regional cancer screening coordination centres in each department. Participation in opportunistic cervical cancer screening was evaluated as self-reported data.
4,634 questionnaires were returned out of the 17,194 sent, giving a global return rate of 27%. The highest rate of return (73.5%) was obtained from women who had participated at least once in both breast and colorectal cancer OS. An intermediate rate was obtained from women participating in breast cancer OS only (18.7%). Poor levels of return came from women who had participated in colorectal cancer OS only (3.6%) and from non-participants (4.1%). Our results suggest that women with lower educational levels tend to be the most regular attendants at OS (50.3%), compared to highly educated women (39.7%). 11.8% of women were overdue in their opportunistic cervical cancer screening. This percentage rose to 35.4% in the category of non-participants. In addition, women's comments provide a better understanding of the reasons for irregular attendance and non-participation.
Overall, similar behaviours towards screening were observed in the four departments. Our analysis suggests that participation in one cancer OS increases the likelihood of participating in others. This adhesion could be an interesting lever for raising women's awareness of other cancer screenings.
本文研究了女性在 50 岁及以上时面对不同癌症筛查选择的行为。该研究于 2019 年在法国四个地区进行,旨在确定影响人群筛查提案接受度的因素。
向已收到三次组织性乳腺癌和结直肠癌筛查(OS)邀请的女性发送了一份问卷。OS 组的参与者类别是根据每个部门区域癌症筛查协调中心的数据设计的。机会性宫颈癌筛查的参与情况则通过自我报告数据进行评估。
在发出的 17194 份问卷中,有 4634 份被退回,总回复率为 27%。回复率最高(73.5%)的是至少参加过一次乳腺癌和结直肠癌 OS 的女性。仅参加过乳腺癌 OS 的女性的回复率为中等(18.7%)。仅参加过结直肠癌 OS 的女性(3.6%)和未参与者(4.1%)的回复率较低。我们的结果表明,与高学历女性(39.7%)相比,教育程度较低的女性更倾向于定期参加 OS(50.3%)。11.8%的女性错过了机会性宫颈癌筛查。在未参与者中,这一比例上升到 35.4%。此外,女性的评论提供了对不规则出席和不参与原因的更好理解。
总体而言,四个地区的筛查行为相似。我们的分析表明,参加一次癌症 OS 会增加参加其他癌症 OS 的可能性。这种参与度可能是提高女性对其他癌症筛查意识的一个有趣的切入点。