Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit, Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Old Road Campus, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Jul 15;13(7):e0007598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007598. eCollection 2019 Jul.
Melioidosis is a frequently fatal disease requiring specific treatment. The yield of Burkholderia pseudomallei from sites with a normal flora is increased by culture using selective, differential media such as Ashdown's agar and selective broth. However, since melioidosis mainly affects people in resource-poor countries, the cost effectiveness of selective culture has been questioned. We therefore retrospectively evaluated this in two laboratories in southeast Asia.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: The results of all cultures in the microbiology laboratories of Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Laos and Angkor Hospital for Children, Siem Reap, Cambodia, in 2017 were reviewed. We identified patients with melioidosis who were only diagnosed as a result of culture of non-sterile sites and established the total number of such samples cultured using selective media and the associated costs in each laboratory. We then conducted a rudimentary cost-effectiveness analysis by determining the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per DALY averted and compared this against the 2017 GDP per capita in each country. Overall, 29 patients in Vientiane and 9 in Siem Reap (20% and 16.9% of all culture-positive patients respectively) would not have been diagnosed without the use of selective media, the majority of whom (18 and 8 respectively) were diagnosed by throat swab culture. The cost per additional patient detected by selective culture was approximately $100 in Vientiane and $39 in Siem Reap. Despite the different patient populations (all ages in Vientiane vs. only children in Siem Reap) and testing strategies (all samples in Vientiane vs. based on clinical suspicion in Siem Reap), selective B. pseudomallei culture proved highly cost effective in both settings, with an ICER of ~$170 and ~$28 in Vientiane and Siem Reap, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Selective culture for B. pseudomallei should be considered by all laboratories in melioidosis-endemic areas. However, the appropriate strategy for implementation should be decided locally.
类鼻疽是一种常导致死亡的疾病,需要特定的治疗。使用选择性、差异化培养基(如 Ashdown 琼脂和选择性肉汤)培养正常菌群中的伯克霍尔德菌假单胞菌可提高其产量。然而,由于类鼻疽主要影响资源匮乏国家的人群,因此选择性培养的成本效益受到了质疑。因此,我们在东南亚的两个实验室中对此进行了回顾性评估。
方法/主要发现:我们回顾了老挝万象玛霍索医院和柬埔寨暹粒吴哥儿童医院微生物实验室 2017 年的所有培养结果。我们确定了仅通过非无菌部位培养而诊断为类鼻疽的患者,并确定了每个实验室使用选择性培养基培养的此类样本总数和相关成本。然后,我们通过确定每避免一个 DALY 的增量成本效益比(ICER)并将其与每个国家 2017 年的人均 GDP 进行比较,进行了初步的成本效益分析。总体而言,万象有 29 名患者(占所有培养阳性患者的 20%)和暹粒有 9 名患者(占 16.9%)如果不使用选择性培养基,将无法诊断,其中大多数(分别为 18 名和 8 名)通过咽喉拭子培养诊断。在万象,选择性培养检测到的每个额外患者的成本约为 100 美元,在暹粒为 39 美元。尽管患者人群(万象为所有年龄,暹粒为仅儿童)和检测策略(万象为所有样本,暹粒为基于临床怀疑)不同,但选择性 B. pseudomallei 培养在这两种情况下都具有很高的成本效益,万象的 ICER 约为 170 美元,暹粒的约为 28 美元。
结论/意义:类鼻疽流行地区的所有实验室都应考虑对 B. pseudomallei 进行选择性培养。然而,应在当地决定实施的适当策略。