The Nuffield Trust, London.
Academic Geriatric Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton.
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Aug;69(685):e555-e560. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704621. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
'Frailty crises' are a common cause of hospital admission among older people and there is significant focus on admission avoidance. However, identifying frailty before a crisis occurs is challenging, making it difficult to effectively target community services. Better longer-term outcome data are needed if services are to reflect the needs of the growing population of older people with frailty.
To determine long-term outcomes of older people discharged from hospital following short (<72 hours) and longer hospital admissions compared by frailty status.
Two populations aged ≥70 years discharged from hospital units: those following short 'ambulatory' admissions (<72 hours) and those following longer inpatient stays.
Data for 2-year mortality and hospital use were compared using frailty measures derived from clinical and hospital data.
Mortality after 2 years was increased for frail compared with non-frail individuals in both cohorts. Patients in the ambulatory cohort classified as frail had increased mortality (Rockwood hazard ratio 2.3 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.5 to 3.4]) and hospital use (Rockwood rate ratio 2.1 [95% CI = 1.7 to 2.6]) compared with those patients classified as non-frail.
Individuals with frailty who are discharged from hospital experience increased mortality and resource use, even after short 'ambulatory' admissions. This is an easily identifiable group that is at increased risk of poor outcomes. Health and social care systems might wish to examine their current care response for frail older people discharged from hospital. There may be value in a 'secondary prevention' approach to frailty crises targeting individuals who are discharged from hospital.
“虚弱危机”是老年人住院的常见原因,人们非常关注避免住院。然而,在危机发生之前识别虚弱是具有挑战性的,这使得难以有效地针对社区服务。如果服务要反映出日益增多的虚弱老年人的需求,就需要更好的长期结果数据。
确定与虚弱状况相比,从医院出院的老年人在短期(<72 小时)和长期住院后的长期结果。
从医院病房出院的 2 个年龄≥70 岁的人群:短期“门诊”入院(<72 小时)和长期住院的人群。
使用从临床和医院数据中得出的虚弱指标比较了 2 年死亡率和医院使用情况的数据。
在两个队列中,与非虚弱个体相比,虚弱个体在 2 年后的死亡率增加。在门诊队列中,被归类为虚弱的患者死亡率增加(Rockwood 风险比 2.3 [95%置信区间 {CI} = 1.5 至 3.4])和医院使用(Rockwood 比率比 2.1 [95%CI = 1.7 至 2.6])比那些被归类为非虚弱的患者。
即使是短期“门诊”入院,从医院出院的虚弱个体的死亡率和资源使用也会增加。这是一个容易识别的群体,其不良结局的风险增加。卫生和社会保健系统可能希望检查其为从医院出院的虚弱老年人提供的现有护理反应。针对从医院出院的个体采取“二级预防”方法治疗虚弱危机可能具有价值。