University College London, London, UK and specialty trainee in palliative medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.
Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Jul;19(4):306-310. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-4-306.
An accurate prognosis about how long a terminally ill patient has left to live, when disclosed sensitively in open discussions, can facilitate patient-centred care and shared decision making. In addition, several guidelines, policies and funding streams rely, to some extent, on a clinician estimated prognosis. However, clinician predictions alone have been shown to be unreliable and over-optimistic. The factors underlying clinicians' prognostic decisions (particularly at the very end of life) are beginning to be elucidated. As an alternative to clinicians' subjective estimates, a number of prognostic algorithms and scores have been developed and validated, but only a few have consistently shown superiority to clinician predictions. Therefore, an element of uncertainty remains and this needs to be acknowledged when having conversations with patients and their families. Guidelines are available to advise clinicians about how to prepare for, participate in and record prognostic conversations.
关于终末期患者还能活多久的准确预后,如果在公开讨论中敏感地披露,可促进以患者为中心的护理和共同决策。此外,一些指南、政策和资金流在某种程度上依赖于临床医生估计的预后。然而,已经表明临床医生的预测是不可靠且过于乐观的。临床医生预后决策的基础因素(尤其是在生命末期)开始被阐明。作为临床医生主观估计的替代方法,已经开发和验证了许多预后算法和评分,但只有少数评分始终显示优于临床医生的预测。因此,仍然存在一定程度的不确定性,在与患者及其家属进行沟通时需要承认这一点。有指南为临床医生提供建议,指导他们如何准备、参与和记录预后讨论。