Suppr超能文献

识别首次入院患者的非情感性精神病:明尼苏达多项人格测验第二版、结构性诊断访谈和一致性最佳终生估计。

Identifying non-affective psychosis in first admission patients: MMPI-2, structured diagnostic interview, and consensus lifetime best estimate.

机构信息

Department of Counseling and Human Services, School of Education, University of Redlands, 1200 E. Colton Ave., Redlands, CA 92373, USA; Carter Strategic Research, Granada Hills, California, USA.

Mental Health Center Amager, University Hospital Copenhagen, Gammel Kongevej 33, Copenhagen 1610, Denmark.

出版信息

Psychiatry Res. 2019 Sep;279:71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) as a potential means of improving on the SCID's diagnostic efficacy.

METHODS

76 first-admission patients were assigned DSM-IV consensus diagnoses by two experienced psychiatrists using all available information, then dichotomized into non-affective psychosis and other mental illness groups. The patients were also given the SCID and the MMPI-2. The diagnostic performance of the MMPI-2 was compared to that of the SCID to assess both diagnostic accuracy and incremental validity.

RESULTS

MMPI-2 scales 8 (Schizophrenia) and BIZ (Bizarre Mentations) correctly identified 58% and 56% respectively of non-affective psychotic patients. The Goldberg Index had an overall correct classification rate of 70%, but only identified 49% of the psychosis group. The SCID had a correct classification rate of 66% but correctly identified only 25% of the non-affective psychosis patients. Three MMPI-2 scales combined with the SCID resulted in an overall correct classification rate of 73%, and identification of 66% of the non-affective psychosis patients.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the MMPI-2 may identify early psychosis at least as well as the SCID. Furthermore, using a combination of the MMPI-2 and the SCID shows incremental validity over using the SCID alone.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估明尼苏达多相人格测验-2(MMPI-2)作为提高 SCID 诊断功效的潜在手段。

方法

76 名首次入院的患者通过两名经验丰富的精神科医生使用所有可用信息分配 DSM-IV 共识诊断,然后分为非情感性精神病和其他精神疾病组。患者还接受了 SCID 和 MMPI-2 测试。比较 MMPI-2 和 SCID 的诊断性能,以评估诊断准确性和增量有效性。

结果

MMPI-2 量表 8(精神分裂症)和 BIZ(奇特思维)分别正确识别了 58%和 56%的非情感性精神病患者。戈德堡指数的总体正确分类率为 70%,但仅识别出 49%的精神病组。SCID 的正确分类率为 66%,但仅正确识别出 25%的非情感性精神病患者。三个 MMPI-2 量表与 SCID 相结合的总体正确分类率为 73%,并识别出 66%的非情感性精神病患者。

结论

结果表明,MMPI-2 至少可以像 SCID 一样识别早期精神病。此外,与单独使用 SCID 相比,使用 MMPI-2 和 SCID 的组合具有增量有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验